Glenn Beck Exposes Dangerous Link Between Nazi Eugenics and ObamaCare Reform Experts

“Question with boldness.” That is the motto of radio host and FOX News television host Glenn Beck, who says he asks questions no different than ordinary Americans – he just has an army of researchers to help him explore these questions. But what the question explores is the disturbing relationship between eugenics, Nazism, and the imposition of Obama’s health care plan upon the United States.

Like the old adage “those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it,” Beck has looked back to the past to get a glimpse of the future. Throughout the past few weeks, Beck has given considerable attention to the Obama Administration centralizing power under the Executive Branch away from Congress through the appointment of more than 31 powerful “Czars” or “special policy advisors” as the Administration prefers to call them.

Beck argues that the Obama administration’s appointment of czars unaccountable to Congress, ramming massive legislation through Congress, and especially his health-care plan, bear close resemblance to how Germany’s National Socialists consolidated overwhelming powers under the executive led by Adolf Hitler in such a way that strangled democracy in Germany.

Although many people remember the National Socialists for their brutal extermination of the Jews during World War II, Western leaders like Winston Churchill had condemned National Socialism as a regime contrary to the very root of Christian civilization and “guided by the lights of perverted science.”

The question Beck asks is, why does Obama surround himself with so many advisors to reform health-care, who do not believe all human lives have equal value?” And one of Obama’s czars believes that even after birth, a child is not yet human.

Roots of Nazi Eugenics

“They tried to figure out how much is a life worth and put a price on how much each individual is worth,” said Beck, making clear that the logical conclusion is that some lives are worth more than others.

The roots of Germany’s eugenics program, however, began in England and the United States. Beck traces its beginning with the social progressives creating laws mandating compulsory sterilization for groups which the state deemed “procreation inadvisable”: such as the destitute, criminals, and the mentally disabled, some of the most vulnerable members of society. Illinois passed the first compulsory sterilization law in 1907, and more than 30 other states would follow before the Nazis rise to power in Germany.

One of the most egregious cases of this type of human rights violation is Buck v. Bell in 1927. In that case, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes ruled that Virginia was right to sterilize Carrie Buck against her will because, “three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Buck, however, was poor but not mentally disabled. Buck’s sister Doris was also sterilized forcibly when she was hospitalized for appendicitis, but she never found out why she could not have children until 1980.

Beck said that “no one is saying that eugenics is coming” or the “master race,” but a lesson should be drawn from Germany, which descended down the dark road of perpetuating crimes against humanity once they had accepted the principle that there was “Lebensunwertes Leben” or “life unworthy of life.”

Nazi Germany: Cutting Costs By Making Judgments on Quality of Life

For Beck, the idea of “life unworthy of life” gets personal. His daughter has cerebral palsy and he tells his viewers that doctors told him that statistically she would never walk, talk, or feed herself.

“She went to college. They were wrong,” Beck says.

But Germany, which provided universal health care, began to view Germans with conditions like cerebral palsy as primarily a drain on health resources that could be allocated to healthier Germans. Beck choked up as he held a Nazi poster that featured a man with cerebral palsy and said it costs 60,000 Marks to keep him alive. Another poster said that the resources spent for one year on a mental institution could have built homes for Germans.

“What happened in Germany was that they could not afford health-care for all,” warns Beck.

Beck repeats that he does not mean to say that President Obama is building a euthanasia program, like Germany’s T4 program, which put to death around 70,000 human beings they deemed physically or mentally unfit. However, what Obama and his advisors have in common with Germany is the idea that some lives are worth more than others, and in the crisis of the Depression.

But the danger is that since Germany succumbed to National Socialism after its inflationary practices destroyed the economy in 2009, there is a real danger that the enormous national debt of the United States and its inflation of the money supply in order to stimulate the economy could lead to a similar collapse. Such a situation would create, amongst many other dire outcomes, near unavoidable rationing of healthcare.

“If there is a crisis what will they do? Whose voice will he hear?” asks Beck.

Beck says that answer lies with what President Obama himself said on the campaign trail: if one wants to know his policies, then pay attention to his advisors.

So when it comes to health-care reform: four advisors behind the effort deserve special attention: Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel, Health Reform Policy Advisor; John Holdren, Science Czar; Cass Sunstein, the Regulatory Czar; and Van Jones, the Green Jobs Czar.

Another article will detail Beck’s unusually frank and alarming revelations about Obama’s advisors – revelations made on his Fox television program that is skyrocketing in popularity and which Obama supporters are frantically attempting to shut down.

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • Pingback: Brown Pelican Society of Louisiana » Glen Beck Exposes Dangerous Link Between Nazi Eugenics and ObamaCare Reform Experts()

  • DWC

    Let’s be extremely careful to view what Beck states as pure truth. He, Hannity, Rush, Savage all tend to position themselves on the edge (maybe for attention, maybe it’s sincere). I’m no Obama fan … but neither do I endorse the methods in play today.

  • DWC: I agree that Glenn Beck should not be presumed honest just because he’s televised or published — even here. But he isn’t the only or even the first to quote from Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel and Ron Holdren, that they absolutely do not believe in the inherent worth and dignity of all humans, and that they are certain that some of us are better off dead, whether by action or neglect.

    Nor is he the first to suggest that President Obama’s fiscal policies are at the least very inflationary, if not hyperinflationary. I have had that concern myself from Bush’s first stimulus bill — I called it an inflationary bribe, because that’s what it was.

  • elkabrikir

    When Obama advisors talk, I take them at their face value. Read what his Science Czar, John Holdren had to say about forced abortions:

    Dr Ezekiel Emmanuel has quite a bit to say about euthanasia too. In an article that he co-authored for the Lancet he wrote:

    Allocation of very scarce medical interventions such as organs and vaccines is a persistent ethical challenge. We evaluate eight simple allocation principles that can be classified into four categories: treating people equally, favouring the worst-off, maximising total benefits, and promoting and rewarding social usefulness. No single principle is sufficient to incorporate all morally relevant considerations and therefore individual principles must be combined into multiprinciple allocation systems. We evaluate three systems: the United Network for Organ Sharing points systems, quality-adjusted life-years, and disability-adjusted life-years. We recommend an alternative system—the complete lives system—which prioritises younger people who have not yet lived a complete life, and also incorporates prognosis, save the most lives, lottery, and instrumental value principles.

    I try to read primary sources. Glen Beck makes a living talking about certain things. One thing is for certain, nothing he advocates has to do with taking my money and even more importantly, my life.

  • bambushka

    Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it. Those who lived through the 30’s and 40’s in Germany will say this smells very familiar.

  • kymdurance

    This is the third time I have seen this article reproduced almost verbatim in a faith based journal.

    It saddens me greatly that this nonsense is replicated anywhere – it is patently wrong – the attempt to establsih a link between national health care and eugenics and indeed nazism is asinine – it follows the ” all fish swim therefore all things that swim are fish kind of logic” and derves to be dismissed

    I would have thought the editors would demonstrate more discernment when examing a topic as vital as health care.

    National Health systema are all over the world – Australia, France, Britain, Israel – Americans would do well to look for the truth to their efficiacy rather listen to pooted versions from a political zealot