Chicago, IL (LifeNews.com) Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop and several researchers and ethicists have authored a seminal paper calling on Congress to ban all forms of human cloning.
The article, arguing that medicine should reject all forms of human cloning, both reproductive cloning as well as cloning for research, has been published in the latest Mayo Clinic Proceedings journal.
The authors say a ban on research cloning is needed to safeguard against instances of reproductive cloning. A partial ban would be unenforceable, and violations would often go unnoticed.
The pro-life community opposes both forms of cloning as do most elected officials. The debate in Congress is over whether to ban research cloning that involves the creation of human embryos simply to destroy them for embryonic stem cells.
Pro-cloning members of Congress favor a partial-ban only on reproductive cloning while pro-life groups seek a ban on both forms.
The House has passed a pro-life bill banning both forms, authored by pro-life Reps. Dave Weldon (R-FL) and Bart Stupak (D-MI). The Senate has never voted on the issue of human cloning.
If cloned human embryos were produced for research purposes, appeals to compassion within the privacy of the physician-patient relationship would likely lead to their implantation, the authors say. A partial ban would eliminate only the language of reproductive cloning and would facilitate the type of cloning that it sought to prevent.
Pro-life groups applauded the paper's authors for lending weight to their efforts to ban human cloning.
“Any form of human cloning not only poses serious ethical questions but threatens our entire humanity,” Shane Wikfors, director of Arizona Right to Life, told LifeNews.com “We strongly applaud the paper's findings and hope the scientific and political community will take their recommendations in supporting a ban on all forms of human cloning.”
The scientists also say allowing research cloning would run counter to U.S. jurisprudence regarding the treatment of human embryos and to the intent of ethical codes designed to protect human subjects in research.
They urge increased funding for adult stem cell research and other alliterative forms of research that don't involve the destruction of human life.
Aside from Koop, some of the other authors include: William P. Cheshire, Jr., M.D. of the Mayo Clinic, Kevin T. FitzGerald, Ph.D., of the Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University, C. Ben Mitchell, Ph.D., of the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity, and Nancy L. Jones, Ph.D. of the Wake Forest University School of Medicine.
Read the paper here
(This article courtesy of Steven Ertelt and LifeNews.com. For more information or to subscribe go to LifeNews.com or email news@LifeNews.com.)
Also, American Bar Association Wants Equal Rights for Human Clones
SAN FRANCISCO The American Bar Association (ABA), the largest lawyers organization in the United States, with over 400,000 members, says cloned human beings which do not yet exist but which the ABA considers “inevitable” must have equal rights.
“We wanted to be ahead of the curve,” said Bruce Wilder, a sponsor of the equal-rights-for-clones resolution, “We should be thinking of the legal implications of cloning now.”
But some oppose the resolution. “There's very serious scientific doubt that reproductive cloning can work in humans,” said Robyn Shapiro at the Center for the Study of Bioethics at the Medical College of Wisconsin. “I also worry that this is going to prompt another series of discussions of whether an embryo is a person” an issue many lawyers would prefer not to confront.
See previous LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
U.S. Bar Association May Endorse Cloning
(This update courtesy of LifeSiteNews.com.)