Uniting to Exclude Saudi Arabian Airlines

Saudi Arabian Airlines (known as Saudia) declares on its English-language website that the kingdom bans "Bibles, crucifixes, statues, carvings, items with religious symbols such as the Star of David." Until the Saudi government changes this detestable policy, its airline should be disallowed from flying into Western airports.

Michael Freund brought this regulation to international attention in a recent Jerusalem Post article, "Saudis might take Bibles from tourists," in which he points out that a section on the Saudia Web site, "Customs Regulations," lists the forbidden articles above under the rubric "Items and articles belonging to religions other than Islam."

Freund followed up by calling the Saudia office in New York, where an employee identified only as "Gladys" confirmed that this rule really is applied. "Yes, sir, that is what we have heard, that it is a problem to bring these things into Saudi Arabia, so you cannot do it." An unnamed official at the Saudi consulate in New York further confirmed the regulation. "You are not allowed to bring that stuff into the kingdom. If you do, they will take it away. If it is really important to you, then you can try to bring it and just see what happens, but I don't recommend that you do so."

Responding to the Saudi ban on churches and Bibles and Stars of David, some would ban mosques, Korans, and crescent moons in the West, but that is clearly untenable and unenforceable, given the freedoms of speech and worship. The Koran, for example, is not a Saudi artifact and cannot be held hostage to Saudi policies. However closely it identifies with Islam, the Saudi government does not own the religion.

 Further, as Stephen Schwartz of the Center for Islamic Pluralism points out, signs in Saudi airports warn Muslim travelers that the airport's mutawwa'in, or religious police, confiscate Korans, other Islamic literature, and Muslim objects of non-Saudi origin. While discriminating specifically against Shiites and Ahmadis, this policy manifests a wider insistence on Wahhabi supremacism. More broadly, the Saudi leadership runs a country that the American government has condemned repeatedly as having "no religious freedom" and being among the most religiously repressive in the world.

Saudia, the state-owned national carrier and its portal to the world, offers a pressure point for change. To take advantage of this vulnerability, Western governments should demand that unless the Saudi government at least permits "that stuff" in, Saudia faces exclusion from the 18 airports it presently services in Europe, North America, and Japan. If those routes were shut down, Riyadh will face a tough choice:

>Ignore this action: Allowing Western airlines to service Saudi Arabia without reciprocity would presumably be too great a humiliation for the monarchy to abide.

>Cut off the Western airlines in return: Cutting off the Western airlines would unacceptably isolate Saudis from major markets and premier destinations.

>Permit non-Wahhabi religious items: That leaves the Saudis no choice but to accept the import of "Bibles, crucifixes, statues, carvings, items with religious symbols such as the Star of David." Further, once these materials are allowed, other benefits would likely follow, such as permitting non-Islamic religious buildings and services in the kingdom for the millions of non-Muslims who live there. Muslims who reject the Wahhabi interpretation of Islam would also eventually benefit from this loosening.

Such joint action also sends a long-overdue signal to the despots of Riyadh — that Westerners have thrown off their servile obeisance to their writ. Who will be first to act? Which national government or municipality will arise from the customary dhimmi posture and ban Saudia (slogan: "We aim to please you") from its runways, thereby compelling the kingdom to permit infidel religious items, monotheistic and polytheistic alike, into its territory? Where are you Athens, Frankfurt, Geneva, Houston, London, Madrid, Málaga, Manchester, Milan, Munich, New York, Nice, Osaka, Paris, Prague, Rome, Vienna, and Washington, D.C.?

If no government acts, what about a delegation of Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, and others boarding a Saudia flight with much publicity, openly displaying their religious artifacts, daring the airline to confiscate these? Or which public service law firm in those eleven countries will bring local human rights suits against Saudia as an arm of the Saudi government?

This issue provides an opportunity for left and right to unite against radical Islam. Who will take the lead to confront Saudi discrimination, arrogance, and repression?

Daniel Pipes


Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum and the author of several books, including Militant Islam Reaches America and In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power (Transaction Publishers), from which this column derives.

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • Guest

    LIke any of your ideas will happen Mr Pipes!  We have no leaders in the West in case you hadn't noticed.  Further, the only leader is the dollar bill…and oil on this case.

    Thank you for continuing to be a good and faithful citizen, however, I don't have much confidence that anything but a saber down the throat of westerner men and the rape of western females will convince them that Islam hasn't change over the course of 1400 years.

  • Guest

     Why is this now a problem? We have been living in this relationship of unrequited love for generations. Isn't this an issue of diplomacy? When Dr. Kissinger was globetrotting on a quest to make the world safe for democracy it wasn't a deal- breaker then either. Islam guards its gate, we do not.  

    In order to change that we would have to have two diplomats who take their Christian title of Reverent and their self-styled diplomacy very seriously. Two names come to mind. Rev. Jackson and Rev. Sharpton. They could accomplish the results we want if the percentage was in it.

    My first paragraph is reality, the second, shameless, sarcastic snips  

  • Guest

    It is not the Royal House of Saud that dictates these intolerant policies, it is the wahhabist clerics. The Saudis were given dominion over the country that bears their name, by the followers of Wahhab, in exchange for furthering the wahhabist cause.


    The Saudi government can no more change the religeous laws of Arabia, than Bush can rewrite the catechism. Less actually, because Rome does not issue fatwas.

    Richard Bell, posting from his wife's account. She bears no responsibility for my opinions

  • Guest

    Well then the wahhabist cause is being furthered so we're talking to the wrong people. More correctly our "wrong people" are talking to their wrong people and diplomacy works but only for the wrong people.

  • Guest


    Time tends to wound all heals, or something like that.


    Eventually, one of two things is going to happen. Either the oil will run out, or the rest of the world will no longer depend upon it. When that happens, not if, but when, the Middle East and all the folks there will once again become an insignificant population group in a relatively unimportant and inhospitable part of the world.


    This is regrettable, because the people there have much to offer the rest of us, but until they throw off the repressive political and religious regimes they live under, they'll never be able to spread the gifts they have.


    I hope and pray that until that happens, they don't manage to blow themselves or the rest of us off the planet. Just like Christ said to his Apostles about the fellow they couldn't manage to faith-heal themselves, "some times, all you can do is pray for them."


    Folks, pray for them.