The Humanity of the Fetus

On April 19, Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman signed a new state law banning abortions at and after 20 weeks. This isn’t just another abortion restriction—it has the potential to be a major breakthrough in the fight for the sanctity of human life.

The Nebraska law is called the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. As Marc Thiessen writes in the Washington Post, it’s based on reputable scientific studies that tell us “that fetuses can feel pain at 20 weeks, and possibly as early as 17 weeks when a portion of the brain called the ‘subplate zone’ is formed.”

And, according to the widely respected Dr. Kanwaljeet Anand, who has been studying infant pain for 25 years, unborn infants may feel pain more keenly than those already born.

Of course, the Nebraska law faces court challenges. Why? Because it restricts abortion according to when a fetus can feel pain—at 20 weeks—instead of when a fetus can survive outside the womb—usually 22 to 24 weeks. Already the Center for Reproductive Rights has called it “unconstitutional” and hinted that they’re planning litigation. No doubt other pro-abortion groups will be lining up to help.

But, as Thiessen says, “regardless of the legal outcome, a national discussion on the topic of ‘fetal pain’ can only help the pro-life movement.”

It’s easy to see why. As science and technology develop ever more sophisticated ways for us to study the child in the womb, it’s getting harder and harder for the pro-choice movement to argue in favor of snuffing out that child’s life. And who would want to argue in favor of deliberately causing the child pain on top of that?

What we’re talking about here is no less than the humanity of the fetus, and science is making that subject harder and harder to avoid.

The scientific studies are backing up what our faith had already told us: that the life in the womb is indeed a human life, with the same qualities that make us consider our own lives sacred—a beating heart, brain function, and sensitivity to pain being just a few of them. And so we believe that a child’s life is a gift from God and worthy of protection and care.

Abortionists can lie all they want to about the development of the fetus. Undercover videos recently taken at a Kentucky abortion clinics show that they’re still lying to women and girls about the development process. But those lies are getting easier and easier to disprove. And the facts are on our side.

The more we talk about those facts, the more the law will come to be on our side as well. Nebraska took the lead in this case because the state government wanted to prevent infamous late-term abortionist LeRoy Carhart from following through on his stated intentions to carry on the work of the late George Tiller. If the Nebraska law holds up in court, other states are likely to follow.

Even the pro-abortion forces can’t plausibly deny what our own eyes and ears are telling us about the life in the womb. In this case, seeing is believing—and what we’re seeing, by the grace of God, could finally put a stop to the wanton destruction of unborn human lives.

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • Catholic Exchange has done a really good job of being careful with language. Usages such as gay “marriage” (always in quotes), “homosexualist” instead of “homosexual”, not using the noun “couple” to refer to gay partners, et al. all speak of an overriding concern for a linguistic accuracy that reflects the underlying truths.

    Now I have a proposal. Let’s abolish the word “fetus.” I hate it. For 100,000 years a woman has known that the child she carries beneath her heart is a “baby,” perhaps an “unborn baby,” but a baby nonetheless. I don’t know when the technical term “fetus” made the leap from medical textbooks and into the common usage but I’m guessing it’s, hmmmmm…., sometime around 1973 maybe? After a certain segment of society saw the need to dehumanize the unwanted child, as a prelude to killing him or her?

    Woman have babies, we love babies, we’d give our lives for babies… Let’s call them what they are, and give them, through our careful use of language, the full recognition of their humanity that they deserve. I think Catholic Exchange should adopt the term “unborn baby” or “preborn baby” as a matter of editorial policy. Does anybody agree?

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention The Humanity of the Fetus | Catholic Exchange --

  • krby34

    PrairieHawk – I second your motion.

    Lets put it to a vote. All others in favor can post here also. It is quick and easy.

  • Terri Kimmel

    I vote “baby” too.

  • maggied

    I agree. Early on Dr. Mildred Jefferson, who spoke out against abortion, said diminishing the image of the preborn baby was necessary (and done by a supportive media) for people to change their thinking. The use of the word fetus was used is because it also sounds like festus and even feces. Words count.

    I suggest, not only using the word “baby” but use the word “child” since historically women were said to be “with child” when pregnant. Aren’t they still?. The sign I carry outside our local abortuary says “Protect Your Child” included with a photo of my happy daughter taken a day after her birth.

  • consecrata

    I agree…using the term ‘human baby’ has great power and significance…teenagers have told me they were taught that abortion is okay because it’s not a baby just a foetus, a bunch of blood and tissues…when I explained that what is in the womb of the mother is a human baby in it’s early form, they responded: “Wow! I didn’t know that”…abortion is the termination of a human life, and mass abortions as we have seen since 1973 are, in fact, the genocide of the human race…let us not mask the reality.