Precise DNA Language Points to Intelligent Design of Life



Toronto — Science, seen as the enemy of religious faith for over a hundred years, is now becoming the believer’s best friend. As scientific discoveries continue, the recourse to Darwinian Evolution is becoming more improbable, as attested in a recently published article on DNA by Mario Seiglie in the May edition of The Good News.

Mr. Seiglie’s article, which compiles evidence from various scientific sources, presents the amazing reality that our DNA is, in essence, the carrier of an intricate and complicated language that could not possibly have come about by random chance. Mr. Seiglie writes that, “As scientists began to decode the human DNA molecule, they found something quite unexpected — an exquisite 'language' composed of some 3 billion genetic letters. ‘One of the most extraordinary discoveries of the twentieth century,’ says Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., ‘was that DNA actually stores information — the detailed instructions for assembling proteins — in the form of a four-character digital code,’ (quoted by Lee Strobel, The Case for a Creator, 2004, p. 224).”

To put it into layman’s terms “the amount of information in human DNA is roughly equivalent to 12 sets of The Encyclopedia Britannica — an incredible 384 volumes worth of detailed information that would fill 48 feet of library shelves!”

At the same time this immense amount of information is contained in a space that is only 2 millionths of a millimeter thick. Quoting molecular biologist Michael Denton, Sieglie explains that a teaspoon of DNA, “could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and “there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written” (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334).

Critics of the idea that DNA has its own language fail to consider the fact that, as a language, it is extremely precise. As Mr. Seiglie points out, “the average mistake that is not caught turns out to be one error per 10 billion letters. If a mistake occurs in one of the most significant parts of the code, which is in the genes, it can cause a disease such as sickle-cell anemia. Yet, even the best and most intelligent typist in the world couldn't come close to making only one mistake per 10 billion letters — far from it.”

Most schools in the developed parts of the world are still using textbooks that present Darwinian evolution as fact. In the United States, however, there is an increasingly vocal push to present Creation Science as an alternate theory. This movement gains credibility as more scientists admit (some reluctantly) that science is disproving Darwinian Evolution. Sieglie refers to one such conversion, “‘As recently as twenty-five years ago,' says former atheist Patrick Glynn, 'a reasonable person weighing the purely scientific evidence on the issue would likely have come down on the side of skepticism [regarding a Creator]. That is no longer the case.' He adds, 'Today, the concrete data point strongly in the direction of the God hypothesis. It is the simplest and most obvious solution . . .’” (God: The Evidence, 1997, pp. 54-55, 53).

Pro-life supporters are welcoming the information, and are eager to see the implications of this growing scientific awareness play out. The three great pseudo-scientific legs to modern thought are falling, one by one. Quoting Professor Philip Johnson, Seiglie writes, “Every history of the twentieth century lists three thinkers as preeminent in influence: Darwin, Marx and Freud. All three were regarded as 'scientific' (and hence far more reliable than anything 'religious') in their heyday.

“Yet Marx and Freud have fallen, and even their dwindling bands of followers no longer claim that their insights were based on any methodology remotely comparable to that of experimental science. I am convinced that Darwin is next on the block. His fall will be by far the mightiest of the three” (Johnson, p. 113).

The growing scientific support for the premise of an Intelligent Design to the created Universe, which points to a Creator of all humanity, will give further encouragement to those who champion life issues such as the right to life, as well as authentic and moral bio-ethics.

See also

Full Article, “DNA: The Tiny Code That's Toppling Evolution”

(This update courtesy of LifeSiteNews.com.)

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

MENU