“Occupy Wall Street”: Whiners of the US, Unite

If my email is any indication, the great divide in our nation is not between the haves and the have-nots, but between the literate and the folks who never learned the difference between there, their, and they’re.

Trust me, they’re out there, spouting off their strongly held opinions and punctuating their diatribes with veiled threats about how they’re going to “storm the castle,” so if I’m there, I should beware.

Let’s pause for context: one of my earlier columns appears to have “gone viral” via email. Someone copied and pasted it into a message and sent it to his or her friends, and it has become one of those “Fw: fw: fw: fw:” messages not unlike the ones my mom sends to me that I delete without opening. (Sorry, Mom.)

But plenty of people do open those forwards and read them all the way to the bottom, where my website’s URL follows the text of my column.

The column, in case you missed it, was a traditional mom’s take on a few (importantly, not all) life lessons that seem not to have been taught to some (again, not all) of the Occupy Wall Street folks.

These lessons include truisms such as “Life isn’t fair,” “Nothing is free” and “Your word is your bond.” I also included a couple of snarky items about the manner in which some (obviously, not all) of the protesters present and comport themselves, because, hey, I’m a columnist, and that’s part of the fun.

It should be noted that the now-viral column was the third in a series that I wrote about the Occupy Wall Street “movement,” the first having deconstructed the protesters’ “demands” (Summary: “Everything for Everyone!”) and the second being the serious observation that the protesters’ cries for collectivism will not solve what essentially is a lack of personal and public morality in government and the private sector.

Nothing but resurgence in personal and public morality will solve that.

Ah, but only the quirky “advice” column is roaming the internet. That’s a pity, as the serious one was much more important.

But back to the issue at hand, that being that I am an idiot, at least according to about 20 percent of the people who have emailed me in response to my tongue-in-cheek parental advice.

Also, according to this faction, I necessarily must be among the 1 percent of “fat-cat millionaires” and obviously must have a lobbyist in Washington doing my “dirty work.”

Except I’m not. An idiot, that is. (I’m also not a millionaire with a lobbyist.) I do have a lot of dirty work, but in the interest of good taste, I’ll leave my toilets out of this discussion.

Fortunately, the vast majority of folks who have taken the time to send emails have shared with me their dismay, not only about the substance of the occupiers’ demands and calls for collectivist (read: socialist) solutions, but equally at the essential character of the folks stubbornly overtaking parks and public spaces across the nation.

The reality is, much of what is happening in the occupier encampments isn’t pretty, but it also conveniently is being ignored by the dominant liberal media.

Occupiers and tea partyers alike agree that greed and corruption may have become the defining features of our public institutions. On this the nation seems to be undivided.

But make no mistake: the people occupying drum circles from coast to coast aren’t “creating consensus” around their vision of America. Overwhelmingly, I’m hearing from folks who wish they could lead the human megaphone with the words, “Quit whining and clean up after yourselves.”

Yes, there are protesters who played by the rules but were burned by the system. But for every occupier who has lost a house or a job or carries a student loan balance, there are tens of thousands more who can’t spare the time to shake their fists at Wall Street.

They’re too busy starting over, making ends meet, fulfilling their obligations, and serving their communities.

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • plowshare

    This apologia of hers would be a lot more convincing if Marybeth had come through with a url for one of the “serious” columns she did on the subject. I related in my second comment how I had no success in finding anything like the demands list that she attributed to them, yet got no reply — not even a response to the question at the end. Here is what I wrote:

    I am not having much luck finding the list of 13 cited in the article. The closest I have been able to come so far is the following, far different set of demands:


    Could it be that the initial list caused so much embarrassment that it was pulled?

  • holdermom

    Plowshare, it’s shocking to me that you could not find the list of 13. It only took me about 10 seconds to find it!

  • rakeys

    The list of 13 can be found here http://occupywallst.org/forum/proposed-list-of-demands-for-occupy-wall-st-moveme/

    Occupy Wall Street .org says
    Admin note: This is not an official list of demands. This is a forum post submitted by a single user and hyped by irresponsible news/commentary agencies like Fox News and Mises.org. This content was not published by the OccupyWallSt.org collective, nor was it ever proposed or agreed to on a consensus basis with the NYC General Assembly. There is NO official list of demands.

    What i find even more confusing is that “There is NO official list of demands.’
    I would like to help but if their leaders don’t know what they want, how can anyone help them?


  • plowshare

    Thank you, rakeys. Holdermom could learn a lesson in helpfulness from you.

    I may have used a different search engine, or that “page” might have become more prominent in the meantime due to having over a thousand comments. Anyway, I spent close to half an hour last month navigating the huge website that was linked in Marybeth’s earlier column, and reported on the closest thing I could find.

    As to your last comment: it does not appear as though “Occupy” has any official leaders in the first place. There are several organizations that try to speak for the movement. The one we’ve been looking at so far is here:
    It claims not to be political, and tries to distance itself from:

    There may be others.