A Marked Man: Should Catholics Get Tattoos?

From small ankle tattoos to tattooed sleeves, I am seeing tattoos on men and women more and more frequently. In fact, an estimated 40 million Americans have at least one tattoo, and tattoo parlors are one of the fastest growing businesses in the U.S.

With the increased popularity of tattoos comes the question of their morality. After all, a tattoo is a permanent marking of the body—a serious issue to be sure. So are they wrong? Should a good Catholic get one?

I am well aware that the answers to this question vary widely. Some feel strongly that marking your body is always immoral. Others see tattoos as a perfectly legitimate form of self expression. But personal feelings aside, is there an objective answer? Let’s take a look.

Right or Wrong?

The primary argument opponents of tattoos cite is the Levitical law prohibiting them. Leviticus 19:28 says, “Do not lacerate your bodies for the dead, and do not tattoo yourselves. I am the LORD.”

While this sounds like a fairly clear condemnation of tattoos, we have to keep in mind the context of the Old Testament law. It’s fairly clear to me that the prohibition against tattoos was directly related to pagan worship, just as the prohibition against graven images was.

But regardless of the original intent, it is clear Catholic teaching that the old covenant ceremonial law no longer applies to us as new covenant faithful, and to say otherwise is contrary to the whole message of the New Testament. For example, immediately preceding and following that verse are prohibitions against trimming one’s beard and eating red meat. Now, I recently ate a medium rare steak, and I’m pretty confident I didn’t sin. I also regularly trim my beard, which also isn’t a sin (though some might think it is!).

There are literally hundreds of old covenant laws that no longer apply to us as Christians. We can’t cherry pick laws from the Old Testament to use as ammunition for our personal preferences. Either we follow them all, or we don’t—and St. Paul makes it perfectly clear that the ceremonial law is no longer binding.

I’ll cut to the chase: There is nothing immoral about tattoos. Mother Church has never condemned them, and neither can I. It is one of those areas where a Catholic must follow his or her conscience.

Personally, I wouldn’t get a tattoo. I don’t find them attractive, and they are far too permanent for my taste. That said, those of us who dislike tattoos should be careful never to judge a brother or sister in Christ who chooses to get one.

Danger, Will Robinson, Danger

While tattoos may not be immoral, I strongly believe they need to be approached with an extra degree of caution and prudence due to their permanence. Yes, they can sometimes be removed, but this is a painful and expensive process. Accordingly, you should never get one lightly or flippantly, nor should you cover your body in things that are displeasing to God (a naked or scantily clad lady on your arm is a not acceptable).

Here are two things you should keep in mind if you are considering a tattoo.

1. Type – One of the most important decisions regarding tattoos is what kind you choose to get. This may seem rather obvious, but I know far too many individuals who have gotten a tattoo they later regretted. Whether it’s the name of an ex-girlfriend, an obscene image, or a curse word, there are some things you don’t want marking your body forever. And while tattoos themselves may be amoral, your choice of tattoo can be indeed be immoral depending on what it is.

If you decide to get a tattoo, think of it as putting on a piece of clothing that you will be wearing forever. If you can’t imagine yourself wearing it when you’re 50 or 70 years old, you shouldn’t get it. Take extra time to examine your motives. Is this a rash decision motivated by peer pressure or an attempt to be cool? Or is something deeply meaningful to you?

I have seen beautiful tattoos of Our Lady of Guadalupe or the Sacred Heart that were chosen out of devotion and love. But I have also seen “Murder” tattooed on someone’s neck and Betty Boop on someone’s arm. Some choices are clearly better than others, and some are indeed immoral.

When choosing a tattoo, the best rule is that of St. Paul: Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable.

2. Degree – Another consideration that warrants prudence is the amount and placement of tattoos. Your face, neck, or other highly visible areas are probably not wise places to mark your body. In other words, don’t express your grief by getting tattoo tears!

As with anything, moderation is also important. While a tattoo is not wrong, it is excessive and probably immoral to cover your entire body in ink. It is certainly not in accord with the virtue of temperance and the scriptural command to exercise “moderation in all things.” I admit it is difficult to choose a point when tattoos become excessive, but it is always best to exercise a high degree of caution.


Opinions are strong on both sides of this issue, and I’m sure there will be some readers who disagree with my assessment. Still, love them or hate them, I can find nothing that prohibits a Catholic from getting a tattoo, and we must be careful not to make this a moral issue when there is no clear magisterial teaching on it. Still, as with anything in the Christian life, the virtues of temperance, charity, and prudence apply to tattoos.

For those who remain unconvinced, I conclude with the exhortation of St. Paul: “Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Master is able to make him stand.”

This article is reprinted with permission from our friends at The Catholic Gentleman.


Sam Guzman is an author and editor of The Catholic Gentleman whose work has appeared in several publications. He resides in Wisconsin with his wife and two small boys where he is also the Communications Director for Pro-Life Wisconsin.

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • Well done. My husband and I both have tattoos. When asked about the moral implications as Catholics we give the same answers you did. Now I have a well-articulated answer in your post and can just link to it 🙂

  • shelliott22

    This is great! I just converted to Catholicism this past Easter and have a few tattoos myself. I was curious about this so I consulted EWTN.com and found basically the same things you stated. It all depends on the tattoo itself and the meaning behind it.

  • SouthernMom

    I often wonder what folks’ motivations are to get tattoos, especially the large, visible ones. When I hear “self-expression,” it implies (in my mind) “attention-seeking.” Doesn’t that mindset go against the modesty and humility we are called to as Catholics? I will end this comment by repeating that I do NOT know people’s motivations, so if I am off-base, I’d love to hear.

  • CMoraes4

    I got a scapular tattoo and I love seeing it in the mirror. I know it doesn’t carry the same indulgences or effects but I love having an image of Mary and Jesus close to my heart. I’ve only seen this one other time.

  • Phil Atio

    I think getting tattoos have a similar motivation to other things we do for self-expression: decorating the house, buying new clothes, getting a new hairstyle, etc. These are all ego-based activities and we shouldn’t kid ourselves that they are not. However, that being said, most of us are quite ego-based beings and I don’t see tattoos as anything different than what other folks do day to day.

  • Kelli

    To anyone considering a tattoo, ask yourself if it’s worth the possible risk of infection. Too much tattooing isn’t good for your health. I predict that we will see new disease and illness in the future from such tattooing. Also, why do we as a culture feel the need to personalize everything when we are so depersonalized with everyone?

  • St. Ambrose

    How about remembering our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit and should be cared for as such?

  • Daniel Davis

    God word says-
    1 Corinthians 6:19-20

    19 Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, which you have from God? You are not your own; 20 you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body.
    Anything which does not glorify God is from the enemy. He is a deft operator playing in the minds of people with confusions in turn divisions.
    JN 10:10 ” The thief comes to steal , kill and destroy ,I have come so that you may have life ,Life in abundance”
    So beware of the thief who wants to rob our great treasure.

  • Bob Sanford

    Persons mark things to show ownership. Think of a cattle brand, the brand proves who owns the cattle. The scriptures treat the marking of persons the same way. There is the mark of the Beast in Revelation, and the marking of the faithful remnant in Ezek 9. Christians must never assert ownership over their own bodies 1 Cor 6:19

  • Maria

    Tattoos are huge with Coptic Christians in Egypt. Beyond the small crosses they tattoo on their wrists (for more than just symbolic/devotional reasons!), tattoo culture is pretty much synonymous with the minority Christian culture, since Islam forbids any form of tattooing.

  • PalaceGuard

    Don’t like tattoos, myself. However, I do have pierced ears, the only function of which is to serve vanity. Is that to be considered immoral, then, by those who decry the tatts?