Court Determines Christian Message on T-Shirt Offensive

A constitutional attorney is denouncing a ruling by a three-judge panel of the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals that bars a San Diego high school student from wearing a T-shirt displaying Christians messages in opposition to homosexuality.

With a 2-1 decision, the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court ruling against Chase Harper, who was suspended by Poway High School for wearing a T-shirt displaying the messages: “Homosexuality is shameful” and “Our school embraced what God has condemned.” Harper had worn the shirt &#0151 without incident &#0151 during an annual pro-homosexual event in 2004 known as the “Day of Silence.” But when he wore it to school the next day and was ordered to remove it, he refused. The lawsuit emerged from that confrontation.

In writing the majority opinion, Judge Stephen Reinhardt &#0151 the same judge who has ruled previously that parents have no “fundamental right” to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children (2005) and that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional (2002) &#0151 held that, in this case, the school did not violate Harper's constitutional rights because the message on his shirt was offensive to homosexual students.

Calling Reinhardt's opinion “the quintessential example of judicial activism,” Center for Law & Policy chief counsel Steve Crampton adds his own take: “To read the opinion gives one the eerie sense of what it must have been like to live in Stalin's Russia or Hitler's Germany &#0151 dissenting voices simply will not be tolerated.” And Reinhardt, adds Crampton, “certainly is in competition for &#0151 if not the winner of &#0151 the most liberal judicial activist in the nation.”

“[Judge Reinhardt] is, I think, turning the First Amendment on its head,” says the attorney. “[He] has basically ruled in his opinion that free speech isn't free in public schools on the issue of homosexuality.”

While Crampton says he does not believe Reinhardt's opinion will stand on appeal, he is concerned that it would create a “ranking of privileges” among citizens if it were allowed to stand.

“Homosexuals, especially in the public schools, are basically given the title of nobility that our forefathers fought and died to prevent happening. They become 'super citizens,'” he suggests, “and Christians in particular are second-class [and are] not allowed to voice their own deeply held religious convictions on this subject.”

Crampton believes it is no coincidence this ruling was handed down just days before this year's national “Day of Silence” (April 26).

(This article courtesy of Agape Press.)

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage