Before Tony Blair Becomes Catholic He Must Renounce Anti-Life and Anti-Family Stands

The Sunday Telegraph reports today that former UK Prime Minister "Tony Blair was on the brink of announcing his conversion to Catholicism on a visit to the Pope until a last-ditch intervention by Britain's Roman Catholic leader."  The Telegraph notes that "Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, the Archbishop of Westminster, advised Mr Blair that it would be unwise and inappropriate to use such a high-profile occasion for such an important private event, particularly coming just days before he was due to leave Downing Street."

Faithful Catholics may have breathed a great sigh of relief for the brief stay from scandal city.

Tony Blair, while he may be a star candidate for entry into any pop religion, would be in his current state of unrepentant pusher of abortion and homosexuality a scandal to the Catholic Church.  We have enough of those kind of politicians already, the last thing we need is a very public entrance of another high profile abortion advocate into the Catholic Church.

Now don't get me wrong, the Catholic Church is full of sinners, including yours truly.  But the difference is that Catholics are supposed to acknowledge their wrongdoings as such.  Vices are vices and not virtues. 

The Catholic who falls into sexual sin, and even has an abortion in desperation but truly repents of her actions is far better off than the Catholic politician who, while never darkening the door of an abortion clinic, stands up for 'a woman's right to choose' believing his position is a virtuous one.

Tony Blair's record on life and family is abysmal but worse than that he remains committed to his anti-Catholic stands on those crucial issues.

The April 2003 cover issue of the UK Spectator covered Blair's stand of life issues.  Peter Oborne wrote: "The Prime Minister has never once voted with the pro-life lobby and has voted 14 times for the pro-choice lobby in Parliament. In 1990, during the debates leading up to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, he voted on three occasions to extend the time limit for abortion to birth on grounds of handicap. In December 2000 he gave personal backing to regulations permitting stem-cell research on human embryos; and his government enthusiastically promotes the morning-after pill."

On family issues, Osborne noted: "The married-couples allowance has been abolished, funding has been switched from groups backing marriage to those taking a relaxed view of any kind of relationship, the benefits system has been changed to target all money for children regardless of family structure, etc., etc. Far from being morally neutral on the family, the Blair government has actively discriminated against it."

His record on life and family issues have not improved to date.  In one of his outgoing speeches as Prime Minister, in September last year Mr Blair said: "America does not want stem cell research, we do, we welcome it here." Mr Blair was referring to embryonic stem cell research, which kills embryonic children in order to extract their stem cells.

One of Blair's last acts as Prime Minister was presiding over and rejoicing over the passage of the Sexual Orientation Regulations, which are seen as one of the most serious threats to the Christian faith in the last century.  Christian schools under the regulations will be forbidden from teaching against homosexuality.

Blair announced that there would be no exceptions to the regulations, even for religious reasons.

The Telegraph reports that Blair will now likely enter the Catholic Church at Easter next year.  The paper adds this interesting tidbit: "Despite being asked by Cardinal Basil Hume, the previous Archbishop of Westminster, to desist from receiving Communion because he has not converted to Catholicism, Mr Blair received Communion from Fr Michael Seed while he was at Downing Street and from Fr Timothy Russ and Fr Walsh at Chequers."

Don't we have enough pro-abortion politicians in the Catholic Church causing scandal by receiving Holy Communion?  Do we really have to import another one? Just how much more does Mr. Blair have to do to convince Church authorities that he is dangerously anti-Catholic, anti-Christian?

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • Guest


    He is receiving Communion???  From priests who know he is not Catholic and in defiance of a Cardinal???


    I'm speechless.



  • Guest

    Defying authority in the modern English speaking world is a badge of honor.

    Doing the same publically will make that "honor" famous.

    Doing the above against a religious authority, especially a high ranking one will make the honor famous and heap wealth on it.

    Then the defiant, honorable, famous and wealthy person can join any number of organizations, including churches that will gladly advertise this new member as a VIP.

    Tony, like so many others look at the Catholic Church as just one of those organizations.

  • Guest


    My priest routinely gives Communion to non-Catholics. This even though I have made it known to the bishop. As our deacon says, "We should never deny Jesus to anyone who wants Him."

    There is so little respect for the Eucharist when one has such leadership.

  • Guest

     Has no one heard of RCIA? Mr. Blair must have been told that he is not eligible for the reception of Holy Communion until he has entered the Church. Furthermore, he must have a firm purpose of amendment or the sacraments will not be efficacious.


  • Guest

    It sounds like Mr. Blair isn't particularly concerned with the "efficaciousness of the Sacraments".  That's a shame since St. Paul says that he who eats and drinks unworthily eats and drinks to condemnation.  (1 Cor. 11:29)  If he doesn't believe that, oh, well.

    Just what we need is more "cultural" Catholics!

  • Guest

    Tony Blair is not where our Catholic woes lie. He's a victim of his culture and background. As former prime minister he gets to go to the head of the class. Politics in the church are very much alive. The disgrace is with priests who dispense communion like candy, many themselves not believing in transubstantiation; their bishops who at an earlier time in history would have been selling dispensations. And then there is the undereducated deacon who would gladly empty the Chalice with the Precious Body to anyone who stuck out their grubby hand.

    Run; don't walk from those communion friendly churches lest you bring condemnation upon yourself.

  • Guest

    A agree with goral on this – and I don't pretend to know the whole or inside story – but we can all agree that to date it would seem that Mr. Blair is receiving bad advice.  But let's hold bad judgement until such a time when Mr. Blair has completed his education, entered the church and has had a chance to review and renew his previous positions.