House Unseen

Dwija Borobia

What is the Obsession with College?

by Dwija Borobia on April 9, 2012 · 65 comments

And, as for the critical thinking bit, I’ll go ahead and be a REAL rebel and suggest that human beings have the ability to acquire and practice critical thinking skills at a much younger age than 18.  If you’ve been pressured into believing that you need to pay $35,000 a year in order for your child to understand and participate in logical discussions about ideas (as opposed to discussing events or people), I want you to look me straight in the eye right now.  Take a deep breath.  Are you ready?

You don’t.

I promise.  Just start right now.  If you have an idea, talk about it with them.  If they have an idea, talk about it with them.  If there is an idea presented in a blog post you read or a book you have or a television program you watch and you’re turning it over in your mind or you wish your child would, talk to them about it.  Encourage, nay INSIST, that they read quality literature chock full of the kinds of ideas and the kinds of thinking you have in mind when you envision your son or daughter in one of those glossy college recruitment brochures.  It’s WAY cheaper than tuition and totally works.  Seriously.

Which leads me to believe the following: a four year college degree does not guarantee financial success and financial success does not guarantee happiness.  College is not an inherent good, nor is it an inherent evil.  College is not something that should be expected of everyone and should not be the stick by which we measure a person’s success or value.  College is great for some and unnecessary for others.

So when someone says to me, or to somebody I love, or to somebody I don’t even know, that they shouldn’t have more children because “GASP!  How are you going to pay for all that college tuition!” it makes me curdle inside.  Because the assumption is a) every person is expected to go to college and b) all good parents are able to pay for said college education.  It also subtly implies that older siblings would prefer a free college education to the love and joy of having younger siblings.

Yes, if your child wants to go to college and shows an aptitude for a specific discipline and has a plan, of course they should go.  And you should help them find scholarships and work study programs and grants so they don’t graduate with the burden of student debt.  But not every person falls into that category and they shouldn’t be expected to.

And a family certainly shouldn’t shun the opportunity to grow their family, to multiply their love, to care for another soul, a gift from God, just because somehow we’ve decided that no matter who they are and what they enjoy, that every child should go to a four year college and the parents must be prepared to pay for every cent of it.  Because it just isn’t true.

post signature

Dwija Borobia lives with her husband and their four (soon-to-be-five!) kids in rural southwest Michigan in a fixer-upper they bought sight-unseen off the internet. Between homeschooling and corralling chickens, she pretends her time on the internet doesn’t count because she uses the computer standing up. You can read more on her blog house unseen. life unscripted.

Pages: 1 2

  • http://sainteasy.blogspot.com/ Paige

    This is not necessarily true. In this economic climate, having a degree can actually hinder, not help, you. When I found myself unemployed for a long period of time, I was getting no calls on any jobs I applied for. I took my degree off my resume and voila! Call back on many, if not all of the applications going forward. 

  • Ramblign Follower

    As Catholics, we need to be concerned about the debt our children easily can incur while attending college. For those of our children who will attend, we need to help them find ways to emerge from the experience debt-free – whether that means going parttime and working fulltime, or joining the military, or finding a full scholarship somewhere, somehow. Here is an article that punctures gaping holes in the arguments of those posters who imply that a college degree is essential to raising a Catholic family….

    12 April 2012

    Student debt, like any other form of
    debt, has a strong social impact. As student debt continues to rise in
    the United States, unanticipated consequences on family formation
    becomes more evident.

    While empirical data concerning the effects of student debt on
    marriage, divorce and fertility is still meager, early research has
    found that there is a positive correlation between debt and family
    formation and stability.

    A recent report by IHS Global Insight said that as a result of
    increasing economic stress, young adults are delaying key rites of
    passage typically associated with adulthood, with statistical evidence
    of later marriages and lower fertility rates for people in their late
    20s.

    http://www.economywatch.com/in-the-news/infographic-how-a-students-debt-affects-the-family-unit.12-04.html

  • http://www.clan-donaldson.com/ TheKen

    Well said.  I have often wondered when the paradigm shift would occur. I wish more people would look critically at the return on investment of today’s universities. Great jog!

  • StellaMaris

    As a college instructor (more than 21 years’ experience), I’ve met SO MANY kids who really should not be in higher education.  They don’t have the desire for it, their hearts and skills are somewhere else, and they have no intention of using the skills they are being taught in the field they’re being trained for (this is a college training teachers).  Why are they here?  Their parents insisted that they ‘had to’ have some kind of degree.  It is not easy to teach people who have no particular motivation or talent, who see ‘education’ as a tedious means to ’getting a degree because everyone says you have to have a degree.’ They do what they have to do to pass classes and ‘get a degree.’  It’s not about really learning anything; it’s about that magic piece of paper that ‘everyone’ told them they have to get. I’ve had many conversations with students who realize that they are in the wrong place, trying to do something that doesn’t interest them, that they are not skilled for, students who even know exactly what they would rather be doing.  When I try to convince them to drop out and get on with a satisfying life, the response is the same: ‘My parents really expect me to finish’ or ‘I started, so I have to finish.’  Time, resources and talents wasted, and in our case, someone officially decreed prepared for a career in teaching – someone who has no business in a classroom, and who will probably make a miserable carreer, neither inspired nor inspiring as a teacher.  Someone who really would probably have been better off starting that little furrniture refinishing and repair shop, but who will now be a mediocre, unhappy teacher because ‘My parents said I should go to college’ or ‘My parents said I should be a teacher.’ It’s depressing.

    Maybe we need to replace the stereotype of the ‘stage mother’ with the stereotype of the ‘university mother’ – the parent who forces the child to go to university, even if it’s unrelated to the child’s ability, needs or desires.  Equip your child to make the choice of university and explain its true usefulness, but don’t force them to go or force them to rebel against you if it’s not for them.  Religious vocations, the NBA, marriage and children, a career in the movies, being an acrobat or a gas-station attendant are not for everyone – and neither is college.

  • Yo

    cobblers repair shoes.

  • http://twitter.com/HouseUnseen Dwija Borobia

     Wow, Stella- I think you’re the first college instructor that’s weighed in here and your insight is fascinating.  Thank you!

  • StellaMaris

    I need to chime in here about higher education in America.  I have my BA from UC Berkeley and my M.Phil. from the University of Oxford (yes, in England), and I have taught for more than 20 years in a college in central Europe.  One of the things I am grateful for every day is that I had that American Bachelor’s degree.  I learned more at UCB – more about my field; more about how to think and (perhaps surprisingly) more about the reality of truth (thanks to one excellent professor) – than I did in my Master’s programme at Oxford.  It’s because in the US, we do not specialize from day one of university as they do in European universities.

    The more I see of European education, with its emphasis on specialized training in one field right out of high school, the more I thank God that I went to university in the US.  Because of those first two years (which I managed to stretch to three) of not having to specialize, I took courses at a high level in fields like geology and psychology; French and architecture; American history and Renaissance art; jazz music and early child development.  I can’t remember all the various courses I was able to take, with wonderful teachers, almost all of whom made me think, ‘Wow!  I could study this forever!’ 

    Maybe I was unusual in having a great many interests and going to one of the highest-ranked universities in the US (top ten at that time, in every field).  However, there were courses I took that were not based on existing interests (anything to do with science, for example, and a course in basic computer programming).  I took them to satisfy ‘breadth requirements’ and in taking them, opened my mind in such a way that now, 30 years on, I take positive pleasure in learning about many, many things, and I have the skills to keep learning all my life.

    My colleagues who specialized at the age of 18 or 19 read nothing outside their own fields, apart from newspapers and popular novels.  They cannot think critically.  They set ‘true/false’ tests for students and yet in conversation can laugh at the idea that ‘we can know the truth about anything’.  They see no contradiction in this because they were never taught to THINK, only to memorize and vomit up whatever the specialist told them, in order to get that degree.

    University may or may not be right for someone; some people may know what they want to do before they leave high school; and the quality of universities obviously varies.  Nevertheless, the American system of two years of general studies at university level, if exploited wisely, can set a person up for a lifetime of learning in a way that the early and narrow specialization of European universities very clearly does not.

    This is something to be grateful for – and proud of – whatever other problems one may find with the quality of American higher education.

  • Tecullom

    Could not agree more! This topic needs to continue to be brought up and discussed. Going to university has become an end in itself-so ridiculous. 

  • Pargontwin

    I’ve got just one question, slightly off-topic here.  Why do we say “stay-at-home-mom” when the English language already has a single word for it?  It’s called “Housewife.”  Oh, sorry; I forgot.  That’s not “politically correct.”  (Yes, those are sneer quotes.)

  • Sheila

    I totally agree.  I have a good friend who has a four-year liberal arts degree — and is an electrician.  All the degree did for him was waste his time and money so that now, at 25, he’s still trying to get fully qualified as an electrician.  But he always wanted to be an electrician, so … there you go.  My mom’s mechanic actually has an advanced degree in chemistry.  He spent a year as a chemist after graduating, decided he actually hated the job, and went back to fixing cars, which he happened to be very good at.  Her hairdresser has a classics degree.  He couldn’t get a job in the field, and besides he makes decent money cutting hair, with more contact with people, which he loves.

    The idea that “college will teach you to think, so it’s intrinsically worthwhile” is fine, I suppose, if you actually want to and if you are independently wealthy.  But to go into debt just for an “experience” that will never help you pay your debt?  Why?

    If you don’t know what you want to do with your life at 18, it’s not a problem.  Go work for awhile until you know.  When you figure it out, you will either have some money to get an education with, or some money to set out on your non-college career with.  Either way, it’s hardly wasted time.  Once you graduate college, you’ll have too much debt to change your mind, switch jobs, or take time off to figure things out.  Before you go to college is when you have the freedom to discern.

    For the record, I went to college.  My parents paid for what the scholarship didn’t.  I got a career in the field, and I think my education was “worth it.”  But so many of my classmates didn’t even care about college, so they spent four years (or however long it took them to flunk out) wasting their parents’ money or running up a debt they’d never be able to pay, just for the “experience” of partying and drinking and sleeping all day.

    Sadly, though, it’s a class thing.  College is seen as the entrance ticket to the educated class.  But being part of a class isn’t really worth it if you don’t like it, right?  What’s the real point?

  • Sheila

     Well, I’m not married to my house, so ….

    Personally, I don’t like the term.  I stay at home not because I am doing all the housework (we each contribute according to time and ability) and not because I’m married (I worked till the kids started showing up) but because I am a MOTHER.  People get upset at “full-time mother” because they think it’s insulting to working moms.  So stay-at-home mom it is — even though I don’t exactly “stay home” all the time, either.  I just stay with my kids.

    Sneer all you want, I think I can call myself what I want to!

  • Sheila

     Keep in mind that this depends a lot on where you live.  In my town, college degrees, and jobs requiring them, are rare.  Most people are mechanics, hairdressers, salespeople, and service jobs.  And they can afford to live on these jobs, because they’re in a small town.  In the big city, it’s much harder to get a job without a degree, and much easier to find a good one that will use yours.

  • Gary

    Good for you – I am a community college instructor in Calif. and much less than the state universities, though – you are right the mantra is “go to college”.  I could not have said it better than you have here – college is NOT for everyone and it is about time that more respect is accorded to skilled tradesmen and other “blue collar” occupations. 

  • MightyMighty1

    Hi Dwija, You might really like the books by Dr. Leonard Sax. He is a pediatrician and psychiatrist who noticed all sorts of crazy things happening to kids. His book “Why Gender Matters” goes over a lot of huge differences between boys and girls, and “Boys Adrift” covers why boys are in crisis. He includes as one of his five main reasons the fact that so many boys who would be happiest growing up into the trades are shoved into college instead. You will not believe the stats on how many men aged 18-35 live off of their parents or girlfriends. About 20% in many areas, 50% in Alaska. He quotes company owners who can’t get enough skilled labor domestically. He just wrote another book called “Girls on the Edge.”

    We intend to homeschool our kids, and part of their high school education will be learning a trade that they can use to a.) fall back on, b.) pay for school, and/or c.) make them super handy around their future homes. I’d love for my kids to be nerds like me and my husband, but also handy and thrifty like us too. Hence why we don’t turn our noses up at trade school.

  • Steph

    I totally agree! Our society is so fixated on college being the only path… I loved college, I think it was great for me, but I know nothing practical and I think we’re headed for trouble in a society where learning vocational trades and people with an aptitude for mechanical, spatial or manual labor are looked down upon.  Because it is an aptitude.