Last month, Catholics in the Detroit area were shocked by the news that 8 of the region’s Catholic high schools were slated to close. The announcement adds to a growing trend: 136 Catholic schools across the country were shuttered in 2004. In part, these closings are simply reflective of the ebb and flow of demographics.
As inner-city schools’ primary clientele have moved out of urban areas, the thicket of parishes and schools designed to serve a densely-packed urban Catholic population are no longer viable. Meanwhile, new suburban schools are being built, and many have waiting lists.
But demographics are not the whole story. Nationwide, Catholic school enrollment has been decreasing, even as the population of Catholics continues to increase. A number of factors could be adduced in explanation, but economics is a critical one.
The cost of tuition at Catholic schools has increased 37% over the last 5 years. While it is true that median incomes have also increased, income increases have not kept up with tuition rates. In short, parochial schooling costs more now than it did ten years ago, and the trend shows no signs of reversing.
Among poor families, of course, private schooling has usually been an unaffordable luxury; these trends additionally price an increasing number of working-class students out of the market. Yet students from challenging backgrounds arguably benefit most from what religious schools have to offer. The positive impact of religious schools on troubled and poorly performing students is well documented.
Wedged between the options of 1) public school systems that are failing educationally and/or promoting values inimical to their own, and 2) expensive private schools, many parents religious and otherwise are turning to alternatives such as charter schools and homeschooling.
The various attractions of these alternatives notwithstanding, the economic bind that religious schools and their students increasingly find themselves in highlights an injustice at the heart of American education. Parents who elect to send their children to religious schools must support financially two educational systems the religious one and the state one while parents who send their children to state schools pay no such double fee.
To insist that this injustice be redressed is not to specify the means to do so. Vouchers have been tried with some success in various places. Tax relief, in the form of federal or local exemptions or deductions would probably be better, minimizing the possibility of government meddling in religious education. In any case, the present regime, in which all are compelled to support government schools regardless of those schools’ ability or willingness to fulfill the educational wishes of parents, must be amended.
It is not as though the present system is one of outstanding efficiency. Public discontent with the educational return on public investment is well known. A January 2005 poll found that only 36% of Americans thought the education system “works pretty well,” while 62% said it “needs major changes” or must be “completely rebuilt.” Meanwhile, school districts around the country continue to bombard taxpayers with millage increases, even as Americans consider local property taxes the tax they “dislike the most” more than income tax, sales tax, and social security tax and states increasingly resort to gambling revenue (lotteries and casinos) to shore up their education budgets.
Even so, the viability of the present system depends on a large number of parents opting out and paying out of pocket for religious or other private education. That religious parents are thereby made to sacrifice for the sake of their children’s well being may have a certain salutary effect. But government’s job is not to craft structures that aid the sanctification of religious people by adding to their mortifications. It is, instead, to maintain public order and expedite the pursuit of the good through enacting and enforcing a rule of law that treats people equitably.
Enabling parents to choose schools according to the best interests of their children would probably help keep more Catholic schools in business. The appeal of school choice should extend, though, to those who have no particular interest in religious schools. It promotes responsibility-taking among parents and students and heightens schools’ accountability. In other words, it not only permits religious parents to train their children without added expense; it spurs everyone to the pursuit of excellence.
Kevin Schmiesing, Ph.D., is a research fellow for the Center for Economic Personalism at the Acton Institute. He is the author of American Catholic Intellectuals, 1895-1955 (Edwin Mellen Press, 2002) and is a frequent writer on Catholic social thought and economics.
(This article is a product of the Acton Institute www.acton.org, 161 Ottawa NW, Suite 301, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 and is reprinted with permission.)