The Abuse Plague is Universal

A startling sexual abuse scandal recently broke out in Great Britain. The villain was the late Sir Jimmy Savile, a celebrated (if talent-free) BBC disc jockey and children’s TV-show host who, it turns out, serially abused young women for four decades—perhaps as many as a thousand girls, according to investigators from Scotland Yard, one of the 14 police jurisdictions digging into his crimes. Yet Savile’s demonic behavior, according to Mark Steyn, made a chilling kind of sense, given our cultural moment:

“…for an ice-cold loner of limited social skills, Savile networked very efficiently. If celebrity is being famous for being famous, he took it to the next reductio: He was celebrated for being celebrated, a friend of policemen and politicians. …There’s a particularly cringe-worthy photo from the Highland Games of the Prince of Wales beaming with delights as he spots his pal approaching. His Royal Highness is wearing a kilt, Sir Jimmy a tartan version of his trademark tracksuit. What 12-year-old staggering from the dressing room would want to take on a confidant of palace and police?

“Wherever he is now, I doubt the yodeling grotesque cares about his exposure. It seems to me he was a man who lived principally for sex—prodigious amounts of anonymous, aberrant sex—and he concluded very rationally that contemporary celebrity in an infantilized culture was the perfect cover…”

As police investigations into this predatory goon intensified, another controversy emerged: What did the BBC know about Sir Jimmy Savile, sexual abuser, and when did it know it? The current Director General of the BBC, testifying before a Select Committee of the House of Commons, had this to say about one of his network’s former stars and his crimes:

“So far as I have been able to tell, Mr. Savile prosecuted his disgusting activities in a manner that was very successfully and skillfully concealed. Experts in pedophile behavior have pointed out that this is often the case. … People build long-range plans to put them in contact with their targets. These things are institutionally, it seems, very difficult to deal with.”

Now imagine what the New York Times (and indeed every other newspaper in America) would have written in 2002, or since, if an American bishop had said that about a serial sex abuser in his presbyterate.

While the Savile case was breaking, reports of large-scale sexual abuse in Boy Scout troops were being released by court order. Those crimes, plus the extensive (if largely ignored) research on sexual abuse in U.S. public schools, plus heart-rending accounts of children sold into sex-slavery around the world, make clear that sexual assault on the young is a universal plague, not a disorder peculiar to any profession or institution. That hard fact does not in any way excuse clerical sexual predation; nor do the facts about this plague absolve bishops who were malfeasant in their responsibilities as shepherds, or who trusted to psychology more than moral theology in making their decisions. But the facts—and the selective way they are dealt with in too much of the mainstream media—do suggest that the story-line declaring the Catholic Church a uniquely perverse institution is a lie; those who perpetrate it are either ignorant bigots, or people with agendas other than the protection of young people, or both.

The Church, however, must always hold itself to a stricter standard. That is why the failure to make a full public accounting of the depredations of Father Marcial Maciel, founder of the Legionaries of Christ, is a grave mistake on the part of both the Legion and the Holy See—as is the failure of both the Legion and the Vatican to ask a very hard question: Is the community Maciel founded, and manipulated to facilitate his crimes, a work of God? No one can or should doubt that individual Legionary vocations to the priesthood are gifts of God; the fruits of those vocations testify to their authenticity. But the Legion itself? Surely a religious community, and the Holy See, should be more self-critical and transparent than the BBC.

This article was originally published at the Denver Catholic Register.

George Weigel

By

George Weigel is an American author and political and social activist. He currently serves as a Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Weigel was the Founding President of the James Madison Foundation.

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • OneTimothyThreeFifteen

    I don’t think much of Freud, but if there’s one feature of human behaviour I think he nailed correctly, it is the Reaction Formation.
    “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”

  • Peter Nyikos

    The quote is from Shakespeare, and I’m left wondering what Reaction Formation means; I am not all that well versed in Freudian terminology.

  • Graeme

    Having just looked it up on Wikipedia, Reaction Formation (very simply and crudely) refers to the way that people mask their true desires with an opposite reaction. e.g. a sadist may compulsively give the impression that he is a pacifist; a pervert may give the impression he is very pure. In this case I guess the original comment refers to the fact that Mr Saville was a VERY nice guy in public: charity marathons and being a spokesman for disabled kids going to Lourdes etc., which would possibly a sign of reaction formation, especially if his “goodness” was compulsive and inflexible.

  • mally el

    The BBC is guilty. Its members have been accused of child abuse and the company has been covering it up. Why is the media not goinf after this big organisation?

MENU