Sympathy for the Devil: thoughts on The Golden Compass

When the first Harry Potter movie arrived in theaters several years ago, many Catholic families had divided views about the film. Some enjoyed it as an innocent and intriguing fantasy. Others avoided it because of its emphasis on magic. But the screen adaptation of Philip Pullman's book, The Golden Compass, which opened in Denver on Dec. 7, will likely produce far more agreement. No matter how one looks at it, The Golden Compass is a bad film. There's just no nicer way to say it.

I saw it at an 8:30 evening showing on Dec. 8. The theater was largely deserted. That may be a trend. While The Golden Compass, released by New Line Cinema, ranked No. 1 in box office revenues on its opening weekend, it took in only a modest $26.1 million. The three "Ring Trilogy" movies grossed between $47 and $72 million on their respective opening weekends, and The Chronicles of Narnia had opening revenues of more than $65 million. In fact, secular critics have been less than kind to the movie, and for good reason. It's long, complicated, and despite a very gifted supporting cast and wonderful special effects, the story is finally lifeless. Much of the movie takes place in the polar north, and the iciness of the setting is a perfect metaphor for the chilly, sterile spirit at the heart of the story. Anyone expecting a playful children's fantasy would do well to look elsewhere. There is nothing remotely "playful" about this movie.

As many readers will already know, Philip Pullman is an atheist, and The Golden Compass – the first book in his trilogy His Dark Materials – is a calculated counter-story to Christian-based fantasies like The Lord of the Rings and Narnia. The Golden Compass takes place in a parallel world similar to earth, but dominated by a sinister quasi-religious authority known as the Magisterium. This powerful elite seeks to "protect" people – for their own good – by shielding them from scientific knowledge, represented by the movie's mysterious cosmic dust and a truth-telling piece of technology called an "alethiometer" (or golden compass). More specifically, the Magisterium abducts young children and literally kills their souls, thereby extinguishing the spirit of free thought and inquiry.

The aggressively anti-religious, anti-Christian undercurrent in The Golden Compass is unmistakable and at times undisguised. The wicked Mrs. Coulter alludes approvingly to a fictional version of the doctrine of Original Sin. When a warrior Ice Bear – one of the heroes of the story – breaks into the local Magisterium headquarters to take back the armor stolen from him, the exterior walls of the evil building are covered with Eastern Christian icons. And for Catholics in our own world, of course, "Magisterium" refers to the teaching authority of the Church – hardly a literary coincidence. The idea that any Christian film critics could overlook or downplay these negative elements, as some have seemed to do, is simply baffling.

Strangest of all – and in striking contrast to the Harry Potter and Narnia stories – is the absence of joy or any real laughter in the movie. The talented child actress who plays the film's leading role is hobbled by a character that is uniformly unpleasant, rebellious, belligerent and humorless; the kind of young person described by one of my parent friends as needing a "long time-out."

Obviously, parents are the primary teachers of their children. They need to use their own best judgment about whether a film is suitable for their families. But I'll certainly be encouraging my own friends to put their Christmas cash to better use. In fact, maybe the most cynical and insulting thing about The Golden Compass is that its makers would offer this cold, angry, anti-religious fable as "holiday fare" in the midst of a season built around the birth of Jesus Christ. That's certainly worth a letter to the people at New Line Cinema. With two more books in the Pullman trilogy as possible sequels, it might be helpful if they heard from all of us.

Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap.

By

Charles Joseph Chaput, O.F.M. Cap. is the ninth and current Archbishop of Philadelphia, serving since his installation on September 8, 2011

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • Guest

    It's so encouraging to keep reading that this film is not doing well.  I can't understand Catholics who say that the movie is okay because it has removed a lot of the anti-religious content of the book.  Based on this review, it seems to me that the anti-religious currents are coming through loud and clear.  The movie's portrayal of the Magesterium shielding people from scientific knowledge is very telling.  The other day I saw an interview with Michael J Fox regarding the recent developments in stemcell research, and he was saying that he would vote for whichever candidate was the most "pro-science".  What a simplification!  Catholics are not anti-science, they're anti-death!  And it's science that demonstrates just how human an embryo is.  But he doesn't care about that aspect of it.  I certainly sympathize with his illness, but talk about single minded!

  • Guest

    Claire, you are accurately pointing out how much we have compromised our morality in order to fit in with the Culture of Death. Catholics keep forgetting our call to be beacons of hope in a fallen world. It can make for uncomfortable situations, but think of what fellow Catholics around the world suffer for the faith. Missing a not-so-great movie, is not really much of a sacrifice anyway, according to Archbishop Chaput.

     Leticia Velasquez

    Cause of Our Joy

  • Guest

    That letter dear Archbishop Chaput should be coming from the USCCB, instead they got and endorsement. I know you're on our (Catholic) side that's why I think you should be put in charge of giving some of the others a "long time out".

  • Guest

    Thank you Archbishop for your insightful analysis.  We knew we could count on you to agree with the chorus of faithful bishops exposing this movie for the demonic effort it is.  Nothing from the devil is ever joyful! 

     

    By the way is in the weeks leading up to the release of the movie, several Evangelical leaders criticized the film for being anti-Catholic!   Praise God for them. Maybe one of them would like a job reviewing films at the USCCB….  I am hoping there will be a job opening there soon.

  • Guest

    Just for thoroughness, the USCCB has "withdrawn" the review of "The Golden Compass"

    http://newshub.cnslis.com/2007/12/10/usccb-withdraws-review-of-the-golden-compass/

    There is talk of getting the USCCB to fire the authors of the review, who also wrote a positive review of "Brokeback Mountain," which was also withdrawn:

    http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/dec/07120304.html 

  • Guest

    I just read that in our diocesan newspaper.  Now let's pray that the bishops fire that reviewer!

  • Guest

    Sometimes I wonder if the USCCB actually hurts the Church more than it helps it.  Thank the Lord there are Bishops, who hold the ortodox line,  and are willing to contradict the conference.

  • Guest

    Thank you, Archbishop Chaput for your honest, insightful and much needed comments regarding the film "The Golden Compass." So "the theatre was largely deserted." How comforting! Smile Let's hope parents have the good sense to desert Philip Pullman's books as well!

  • Guest

    The books are equally humorless, dark and violent. There is also some bad logic.

    In Book 2, Lyra learns her companion is a killer. That makes her feel safe. Really? What young girl would feel safe around a stranger who was a murderer? That's dumb.

    But the killer, like Lyra, is only 12. I hate that. It seems obscene to have a child killer as a hero.

    I hope New Line won't make the two sequels as the anti-church themes get worse and the two twelve-year-olds kill God and have sex.

     

    Boycott the films and dont buy the books.

MENU