by Rick Noyes
In last week's Newsweek (the March 19 issue), Jonathan Alter explained that, to advance his campaign regulation bill, John McCain's strategy was “to trade on his rock-star status (and wartime heroics),” and that “to do so, he needs his old allies in the press.” It appears that the media got the memo.
On Tuesday night, all three broadcast networks aided McCain's push for tighter restrictions on individual contributions and the activities of independent groups moves which would give the media even greater campaign clout. On the CBS Evening News, Bob Schieffer openly worried that the so-called reform bill might not pass because Senators are greedy money-addicts. “This money is like a narcotic to politicians,” Schieffer told fill-in anchor John Roberts, “and they're having a hard time breaking the habit.”
To illustrate their point that McCain-style reform is needed, CBS broadcast a second story insinuating that President Bush's decisions are based on money his campaign received from special interests, rather than on the facts or his own policy preferences.
“No presidential candidate ever raised more money from business than George W. Bush,” asserted reporter Anthony Mason. “For corporate America, those investments may be paying off.” No White House spokesman or other pro-Bush source was allowed on CBS to offer a competing point of view.
All three broadcasts portrayed McCain as a one-man cavalry charge. “Can John McCain and Congress fix a system many say is broken?” wondered NBC's Brian Williams at the start of Nightly News. ABC's Linda Douglass claimed “McCain's unexpected popularity as a presidential candidate has forced the Senate to take up campaign finance reform, after successfully blocking it for six years.” McCain, of course, lost the GOP primaries to Bush.
McCain also appeared on all three morning interview shows on Monday, chatting with NBC's Katie Couric on Today, ABC's Jack Ford on Good Morning America, and CBS's Jane Clayson on The Early Show. None were balanced presentations McCain wasn't paired with anyone with an opposing point of view, and none of the 20 questions he faced challenged him to defend the premise or the merits of McCain-Feingold.
Instead, the sympathetic questions focused on the prospects for the bill's passage. “You have waited a long time to get this bill before the Senate,” noted ABC's Ford. “Now that it's there, do you believe you have the votes to get it passed?”
“I know you're worried this is gonna get amended to death, right?” fretted NBC's Couric. But she also pushed McCain to consider tougher regulations: “What about those who say…that, no matter what you do, smart people will be able to get around this system….Are you worried that no matter what you do that the system is so entrenched it's gonna be next to impossible to change?”
When the legislative issue involves a conservative priority such as tax cuts, network reporters become poll-pushers, citing any public hesitation as proof that compromise, delay or “bipartisanship” are required. But no one in the media is asking McCain to compromise or dilute his legislation, even though practically no one at least outside the media is clamoring for his brand of “campaign finance reform.”
Here is a Fox News/Opinion Dynamics Poll of 900 registered voters taken January 10-11, 2001. Multiple responses were permitted.
Q: What do you think are the two most important issues for the federal government to address?
Health Care: 23%
Social Security: 15%
Foreign Policy: 6%
Moral Decline: 5%
Balanced Budget: 4%
Gun Control: 2%
Federal Deficit: 2%
Campaign Finance Reform: 1%
Also at issue with McCain's legislation besides its First Amendment implications is the fact that it aggressively regulates “soft money” political donations from Big Business, but makes no attempt to curb the same contributions from the equally powerful labor unions.
(This report courtesy of the Media Research Center.)