Mother and the Mosque

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

On August 26, a gathering of over 3,000 New Yorkers — Catholics and Protestants, Muslims and Buddhists, Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, wide-ranging ethnicities — joined hands to honor the 100th anniversary of the birth of Mother Teresa. More specifically, they came together in solidarity, in peaceful protest, over the fact that the management of New York City’s Empire State Building refused repeated requests to light the building in blue and white to honor Mother Teresa.

Oddly, management claimed it wanted to steer clear of tributes to particular religious individuals or organizations, even as Mother Teresa transcended any single brand of religion—serving all of humanity, from the unborn to the dying, from Calcutta to Brooklyn. Besides, the building was lit for religious figures in the past, from Pope John Paul II to the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. to a group of Salesian Sisters.

Even more absurd, management happily endorsed those who hated God, militant atheists like Mao Tse-Tung and his communist Chinese. Yes, believe it or not, last October, the building was aglow in red and yellow to honor the anniversary of Red China. No, I’m not kidding. Mao is responsible for 60-70 million deaths, far more than even Hitler. Interestingly, though, it is the religious and saintly—Mother Teresa—who soothed the dying, who was rejected by the Empire State.

And while we’re talking endorsements, isn’t it also interesting that New York’s Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and America’s president, Barack Obama, both endorsed the construction of a Muslim mosque near Ground Zero, site of 9/11? They did so as self-appointed apostles of religious freedom, diversity, and tolerance. And yet, neither Bloomberg nor Obama endorsed the much simpler lighting of the Empire State Building for Mother Teresa.

How’s that for diversity and tolerance? And why am I not surprised?

Dr. Paul Kengor

By

Dr. Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College and executive director of The Center for Vision & Values. His books include “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism” and “Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century.”

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • AnnaMarie53

    Why ANYONE would be surprised by the actions of Bloomberg and Obama, both big backers of the nanny state is beyond me! Sadly, if in their “utopia” there was any religion allowed, I fear it would be radical Islam, which is most of Islam, even though I understand there are perfectly benign Muslims. I do ponder how these “moderate” Muslims would behave, which side of humanity they would come down on if Obozo got his way and this country was overtaken by Islam and its hideous offspring, Sharia law? Why am I so nastily suspicious? Because in the Qu’ran it specifically states how very okay it is to lie, cheat, or whatever they consider necessary to overcome all infidels (us, for those of you who have been under a rock all their lives). NO WHERE in our Catholic Bible does any such sentiment appear. On the contrary, we are instructed to pray for our enemies and all those who wrong us. Wow! Could there be two outlooks, two ways of life any more different? I hope and pray this slap in the face of a mosque will pack up its tent and go somewhere else.

MENU