Moral Schizophrenia

face on beach“Your freedom is likely to be someone else’s harm.”

So says bioethicist Daniel Callahan of the Hastings Center, responding to the recent controversy over provisions in Obamacare that penalize smokers.

In the era of the Bloomberg ban on Big Gulps, the proper role, if any, that government should have in the lifestyle decisions of the American people has been a hot topic of debate among policymakers, politicians, and pundits. Like so many others, this question draws out the moral philosophy of the Left in America. In general, Progressives – as they like to be called – are loathe to pass judgment of any kind on people’s life choices. This flows from the chief “ism” that steers the Progressive moral ship: relativism. People so open-minded their brains have fallen out find themselves justifying, sometimes outright sanctifying, all sorts of behavior in the name of tolerance. “Who are we to judge?” is the Progressive refrain.

As everyone knows, it’s the evil knuckle-draggers over at the GOP who like to pass judgment. Conservatives are the ones who like to punish people who dare to defy their narrowly-constructed morality. We are the ones who are unsympathetic to the plight of racial minorities, homosexuals, women… pick your interest-group.

Unfortunately for smokers (and the obese, for that matter), when the American Left isn’t burning through vacation hours attending Occupy Wall Street rallies, they are busy hitting up 5am spinning classes, surveying the offerings of their local farmers market, and blogging about their experience with the latest cleansing craze. High fructose corn syrup, trans-fats, and tobacco products… these are addictive, evil substances pushed by greedy industrial agro-barons and fast food chains.

Enter the Affordable Care Act and it’s punitive treatment of smokers, who will be subject to as much as 50% higher premiums. The spinners and juicers of the world are more than happy to pay more taxes if it means better access to health care for all. However, as a price of this benevolence, those who make unwise choices must be made to pay their “fair share.” As Mr. Callahan so aptly put it, “your freedom is likely to be someone else’s harm.”

Truer words were never spoken. More from the A.P. article:

“Smoking has the most obvious impact. Studies have increasingly shown harm to nonsmokers who are unlucky enough to work or live around heavy smokers. And several studies have shown heart attacks and asthma attack rates fell in counties or cities that adopted big smoking bans.

‘When you ban smoking in public places, you’re protecting everyone’s health, including and especially the nonsmoker,’ said S. Jay Olshansky, a professor at the University of Illinois-Chicago’s School of Public Health.”

And,

“If I’m obese, the health care costs are not totally borne by me. They’re borne by other people in my health insurance plan and – when I’m older – by Medicare.”

The argument is undeniable. Smokers cause harm not only to themselves, but to everyone who is exposed their secondhand smoke and the taxpayers who finance, in whole or in part, their smoke-induced medical problems. The same can be said of the obese and their myriad health problems. Making other people sick and costing other people money, well that’s wrong. It’s downright immoral! Even in the relativist universe in which Progressive inhabit, these are self-evident truths.

If only the 55 million or so unborn children that have been aborted since 1972 had been the beneficiaries of such clear-eyed moralism. The irony is truly mind-numbing. The same people who are unwilling to bear the financial cost of your pack-a-day habit are more than happy to finance your abortion. And, they are willing to pay for your HIV treatments. This is because we now live in a world where the freedom to eat hamburgers and smoke cigarettes is of questionable legitimacy, while the freedom to have sex at anytime, with anyone, in any circumstances, and without consequences is absolute. The president may not want his daughters “punished with a baby” if they find themselves unintentionally pregnant, but Heaven forbid they develop a taste for Marlboros or Krispy Kremes – that would really be tragic.

We live in an America where Beyonce’s Inauguration “Lip-Gate” garners more media attention than the March for Life. We have fallen down a moral rabbit hole and I fear we may never find our way out again.

The Progressive agenda to make America healthier may well result in a leaner, greener America. Unfortunately, their contempt for the unborn and their embrace of “anything goes” promiscuity will render those benefits moot. A society guided by moral schizophrenics cannot long endure.

 

This article courtesy of Center for a Just Society.

Ken Connor

By

Ken Connor is the Chairman of the Center for a Just Society. An esteemed attorney, Connor is affiliated with the law firm of Marks, Balette, & Giessel, a firm nationally known for its successful representation of victims of nursing home abuse and neglect.

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • John

    Not only that, once Obamacare creates a single-payer government-run system, think of what they will mandate. Vaccinations, sterilizations and euthanasia are all “treatments” that can be argued lower health costs for everyone. But the government wouldn’t resort to coersion, deceit or forcing their will on citizens, would they? God help us.

  • Michelle Marie Allen

    Although I agree with Mr. Connor’s views in this article, I do have a problem with his “misuse” of the word schizophrenia.Yes the ideology of some liberal Democrats could bear some of the hallmarks of the symptoms(delusions, paranoia) of schizophrenia. The far left’s views on subjective morals and apparent prejudicial tendencies towards a certain sector of American citizens(the obese and smokers) certainly is invasive on personal freedom to live as one chooses.. But why further vilify those who are mentally ill to describe a platform of idealism demonstrated by the far left ? Certainly it would be truly unjust to add to the stigma already experienced by people with Major Mental Illnesses. Coincidentally, most medications for mental illness can and do cause excessive weight gain. Also, it has been proven that those who have Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder have a tendency to smoke as nicotine offers some “calming” effect for those with these conditions.

    A more appropriate term for the way the left is trying to “control” certain groups of people should be called what it is: discrimination.

  • kirk

    I agree that it is duplicitous to assess higher premiums and co-pays from smokers and the obese, while requiring that everyone share in the cost of contraception, abortion and sterilizations. On the one hand, (from this columnist’s views), we are forcing individuals with questionable lifestyles (smoking, obesity) to pay extra for their individual choices, and on the other hand, forcing everyone to pay the cost for others with questionable lifestyles (contraception, abortion and sterilizations). There is so much subjective reasoning with these. Most smoking appears to be clearly a “choice” – but not all obesity comes from eating too many cream puffs, in many cases it is hereditory and a lifelong effort to be fit. And, I agree, contraception, abortion, sterilizations in most cases is a personal and individual choice – not a “woman’s right”.
    I suppose we could go further with that. Supposing you (or wife, girlfriend, daughter) gets pregnant. That is usually a choice so should that person pay a higher premium and co-payments? Suppose you drive a car to work in heavy traffic, or routinely exceed the speed limit. Suppose you purposely get only 3 hours of sleep at night in order to build up your 401K…. These also are personal choices that could be harmful to one’s self and others; where will the criteria end? I don’t really know – do you?
    Most of my life I had to live/work around people who smoked and though I never smoked I bear unhealthy consequences of having to breathe their poluted air. For many years I spoke out against having to work in smoke-filled rooms, until legislation brought it to an end. Yes, I DO want them to pay more for insurance and higher cigarette taxes. And, I do NOT want to pay for someone’s contraceptions or abortions.
    But, when it comes to legislating insurance costs for personal choices, where will the lines be drawn?

  • lightedlamp94

    Amen! Sin costs everyone, yet no one wants to calculate that cost.

MENU