Leave the Leftist Out of It

The Catholic Church does not claim teaching authority on matters of economics and finance. When the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace issues a statement on the world’s financial markets, faithful Catholics are not bound to accept the economic analysis it contains.

However, it would be rash and wrong to say that the Church should remain silent about economic questions. Economic decisions have their moral dimensions, on which the Church does have expertise and teaching authority. There are many lessons that financiers could learn from Church teaching:

  • that neither majority votes nor marketplace decisions can settle moral questions;
  • that utilitarian standards are inadequate to define the common good;
  • that private property carries a “social mortgage”—those who own goods have a moral obligation to use them wisely;
  • that the affluent have a duty to care for their brothers in need.

Good points, all. Yes, the Church really does have lessons to teach the financial world. That’s why Catholic social teaching is important.

However, while economists are learning from the Vatican, perhaps the Vatican might learn a few lessons from economic analysts. Just for instance:

  • that government does not create anything, and therefore does not have funds unless it obtains those funds from ordinary people: taxpayers;
  • that the world’s financial system is currently endangered because of the soaring level of government debt;
  • that regulatory agencies have an abysmal record of failure in protecting the public from market fluctuations, speculative bubbles, and even outright fraud—and it is only reasonable to expect that a worldwide authority would reproduce those failures on a global scale;
  • that government interventions in the markets invariably produce unintended consequences, many of them deleterious;
  • that government regulation invariably furnishes opportunities for powerful corporations to manipulate the market for their own purposes, to the detriment of the general welfare.

Those are the economic lessons. There are some political realities that the Vatican might eventually recognize, too. Say:

  • that the UN, the World Bank, the European Union, and other international organizations are not friends of the Catholic Church, and probably never will be;
  • that any international agency empowered to regulate financial markets will—following a pattern that is now well established—be exploited by social engineers to promote contraception, legal abortion, and legal recognition of same-sex marriage;
  • that liberal politicians will gladly accept and exploit the Vatican’s statements on economic affairs, while continuing to work assiduously to promote the culture of death;

Oh, yes, and most important of all:

  • When an obscure Vatican agency issues a statement that contains 50 percent solid Catholic social teaching, and 50 percent flaky leftist theory, the world’s media will ignore the distinctively Catholic content—what the Church should say, what the world should learn—and concentrate exclusively on the leftist theory. So for the great mass of ordinary readers, who will never read the full document, but only scan the headlines, the important message will be lost. What will register, instead, is that the Vatican has not learned its lessons about economic affairs and political realities.

When people reach the conclusion that the Vatican is talking nonsense, they do not ordinarily distinguish between the sound fundamental principles of Church teaching and the questionable economic analysis that follows. Nor do they make fine distinctions on the different levels of Church teaching authority. They conclude simply that the Vatican talks nonsense. So by reaching beyond their field of expertise, Vatican officials undermine their own teaching authority.

Does anyone seriously believe that when the leaders of the G-20 economic powers gather next week in Cannes, whey will spend their time examining the Vatican’s plans for the recapitalization of troubled banks? Of course not. The world’s leaders have plenty of their own expert economists; they need not rely on analysis from Vatican dicasteries. If they think that the new Vatican document is just one more call for international economic regulation—along the lines of many other proposals they have already seen—they are likely to ignore the statement entirely, and thus miss the important messages that a terse Vatican document might have conveyed.

The moral of the story: If you want to promote Catholic social teaching, don’t wander beyond your expertise. Stick to moral principles, and leave economic analysis to the economists.

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • jmalcolm

    Something is off here, perhaps of it is in the tone of the article, I think any essay on a statement from a Pontifical Council that starts out reminding all of us good and faithful Catholics, (you know the the ones who think good thoughts and listen to the Magesterium except for when we have to explain that some particular teaching or guidance isn’t actually from the Magesterium), that we “are not bound to accept the economic analysis it contains,” ought to be received with suspicion at best. OK, even if I’m not “bound” to receive this analysis I think I’ll go ahead and listen to it anyway and act like an adult when the Church speaks to me like an adult.

    While it might feel nice to have an exemption when you’re one of the good guys, I don’t think its wise to automatically throw back the pastoral guidance our Church offers just because it doesn’t fit with our cultural biases.

    Lawler warns that “The UN, the World Bank, the European Union are not friends of the Catholic Church, that they will exploit markets to do bad things and will twist the words of the Church at every opportunity.

    Of course they will, that has always been the case, but that doesn’t speak to the entire picture and neglects the mission of the Church who, in the long run always comes out victorious, (despite the best and worst efforts of her people). World organizations need the guidance of the Church on all matters. The EU just banned stem cell patents that destroy embroyos, so perhaps they might actually prove open to reason on occasion. Should we really just write the EU off entirely? Isn’t it the Catholic Church’s responsibility to engage these organizations and speak truth to power? Besides here in the US our own govt has in its history only barely tolerated the Catholic Church…at best. Whether leaning left or right, markets and politics can easily be co-opted for evil. That should increase, not decrease, the need for the Church to speak directly to those ideas.

  • jmalcolm

    sorry for the bad grammar. meant to edit before clicking “submit.” Hopefully the point is conveyed, “As for me, I’m going to listen to Pontifical Councils instead of assuming that the Vatican is ignorant with regards to the favored economic analysis the author would prescribe.”

MENU