Kathleen Parker’s Problem

Catholic League president Bill Donohue commented today on columnist Kathleen Parker’s piece from [November 18] on religion and politics:

“In one of the most infamous articles ever written about people of faith, Michael Weisskopf called evangelicals ‘largely poor, uneducated and easy to command.’ He wrote that in the Washington Post in 1993. Fast forward 15 years to the Internet site of the same newspaper and what we have is another stab at evangelicals, only this time the goal is more wide ranging: Kathleen Parker wants to privatize religion.

“Parker labels conservative evangelicals ‘oogedy-boogedy’ people with their ‘armband religion,’ the kind of folks that ‘used to be relegated to wooden crates on street corners.’ She wants to know why anyone would pay attention to such slugs, or what she calls the ‘lowest brows’ among us. Then she sets her sights higher by saying that religion must be ‘returned to the privacy of one’s heart where it belongs.’

“When Pope Benedict XVI was in Washington last April, he said, ‘Any tendency to treat religion as a private matter must be resisted.’ He was right. That’s what they do in Castro’s Cuba-they privatize religion.

“Traditional Catholics, evangelical Protestants and Orthodox Jews, as well as most Mormons and Muslims, are joined at the hip in the culture war. They will continue to fight the good fight and will not be deterred by those whose inflated perch sits above the ‘lowest brows,’ including those raised on ‘wooden crates on street corners.’ Not only will they not recede from public life, they will bring their religious values to bear in the public square with increased vigor.

“Maureen Dowd has inspired a flock of female wannabes. Whatever might be said about Dowd, the woman knows how to write a cogent piece. Would that her imitators at least aspire to her level.”

Contact Kathleen Parker: kparker@kparker.com

Subscribe to CE
(It's free)

Go to Catholic Exchange homepage

  • ctporrell

    Can you explain how the article begins by talking about Kathleen Parker but then mysteriously switches to Maureen Dowd? This is quite confusing and brings accuracy into question.

  • Cooky642

    ctporrell, he seems to be saying that Ms. Parker is a disciple (a very poor one, but a disciple nonetheless) of Ms. Dowd.

    Frankly, I don’t care who’s a disciple of whom: they’re both full of it! Anyone with even a passing familiarity with the Bible knows that Jesus did not condone, promote or intend for “religion” to be “privatized”. DUH! I really have to wonder why Mr. Donohue (or anyone else) gives these poor deluded fools the time of day!

MENU