Stop what, you ask?
Coined in Great Britain a decade ago, the neologism “Islamophobia” was launched in 1996 by a self-proclaimed Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia. The word literally means undue fear of Islam, but it is used to mean prejudice against Muslims and joins over 500 other phobias spanning virtually every aspect of life.
The term has achieved a degree of linguistic and political acceptance, to the point that the secretary-general of the United Nations presided over a December 2004 conference titled “Confronting Islamophobia,” and in May a Council of Europe summit condemned Islamophobia.
The term presents several problems, however. First, what exactly constitutes an undue fear of Islam when Muslims acting in the name of Islam today make up the premier source of worldwide aggression, both verbal and physical, versus non-Muslims and Muslims alike? What, one wonders, is the proper amount of fear?
Second, while prejudice against Muslims certainly exists, Islamophobia deceptively conflates two distinct phenomena: fear of Islam and fear of radical Islam. I personally experience this problem: despite writing again and again against “radical Islam,” the ideology not Islam the religion I have been made the runner-up for a mock Islamophobia Award in Great Britain, deemed America's leading Islamophobe, and even called an Islamophobe Incarnate. (What I really am is an Islamism-ophobe.)
Third, promoters of the Islamophobia concept habitually exaggerate the problem:
• Law enforcement: British Muslims are said to suffer from persistent police discrimination, but an actual review of the statistics by Kenan Malik makes mincemeat of this Islamophobia myth.
• Cultural: Muslims are faced with an extreme flow of anti-Islamic literature that preaches hatred against Islam novels, movies, books and researches claims the president of the Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences in Virginia, Taha Jabir Al-Alwani. Just among the best-selling novels alone there are almost 1000 novels of this type. One thousand bestsellers vilify Islam? Hardly. In fact, barely a handful do so (for example, The Haj, by Leon Uris).
• Linguistic: Alexander Joffe of Campus Watch reported that a professor of Islamic studies at George Washington University, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, falsely reported in his keynote speech at a UN event, “Confronting Islamophobia,” attempts to hide the Arabic origins of English words such as “adobe” which derives in fact from ancient Egyptian, not from Arabic.
• Historical: The term “anti-Semitism” was originally used against Arabs living in Spain, Nasr also stated in his speech, and was not directed at Jews until after World War II. Nonsense: “anti-Semitism” dates back only to 1879, when it was coined by Wilhelm Marr, and has always referred specifically to hatred of Jews.
Fourth, Hizb ut-Tahrir's manipulation of Stop Islamophobia betrays the fraudulence of this word. As the Sunday Times article explains, ostensibly the campaign’s goal is to fight anti-Muslim prejudice in the wake of the London bombings, but it quotes Anthony Glees of London’s Brunel University to the effect that the real agenda is to spread anti-Semitic, anti-Hindu, anti-Sikh, anti-homosexual, and anti-female attitudes, as well as foment resentment of Western influence.
Finally, calling moderate Muslims “Islamophobes” betrays this term’s aggressiveness. As Charles Moore writes in the Daily Telegraph, moderate Muslims, frightened of what the Islamists are turning their faith into, are the ones who most fear Islam. (Think of Algeria, Darfur, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan.) They cannot find the courage and the words to get to grips with the huge problem that confronts Islam in the modern world. Accusations of Islamophobia, Malik adds, are intended to silence critics of Islam, or even Muslims fighting for reform of their communities. Another British Muslim, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, discerns an even more ambitious goal: all too often Islamophobia is used to blackmail society.
Muslims should dispense with this discredited term and instead engage in some earnest introspection. Rather than blame the potential victim for fearing his would-be executioner, they would do better to ponder how Islamists have transformed their faith into an ideology celebrating murder (Al-Qaeda: “You love life, we love death”) and develop strategies to redeem their religion by combating this morbid totalitarianism.
Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum and the author of several books, most recently Militant Islam Reaches America. You may visit his website by clicking here and purchase his books by clicking here.
(This article courtesy of the Middle East Forum.)
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO OUR READERS
Catholic Exchange is free—but it is not free to produce. Advertising revenue covers only a fraction of the cost to generate reliably Catholic commentary and news, inspiring videos, a selection of the best Catholic blogs, and daily meditations and prayers.
To give us the strength and stability we need, Catholic Exchange is turning to you—our loyal reader—and asking you to become a monthly contributor.
Whether you can give $5 or $25, $50 or $100 each month, please leave something behind so we can continue—and strengthen—this important apostolate.
We are deeply grateful for one-time gifts, but we encourage you to choose “Monthly” on the drop-down menu. Your support will ensure that Catholic Exchange will be here during this most critical moment for the Church and America.