Post edited 8:24 am - September 20, 2009 by saintstephen
Post edited 8:44 am - September 20, 2009 by saintstephen
Should you watch the movie “The DiVinci Code” starring Tom Hanks, the screen writer develops the story [untrue] that Christ married Mary Magdalene and she conceived “The Royal bloodline” in a daughter I believe from memory named “Anne”.
The fictional presentation of course is believed by many as accurately depicting the “normal” tendency of man toward bonding sexually with woman to procreate children.
What is entirely stupid about this fallacy is that Christ was Celibate and by his Supernatural being as both God and man dedicated in purity to his mission of Salvation. His pure intention was the Redemption of Souls through his Supreme Sacrifice on the Cross and logic dictates as “Spock” would say that it is entirely “illogical” that one as pure in intention as Christ would allow a woman to prevent his Holy Intention as directed by God the Father from succeeding.
Christ exhorted Peter when Peter responded["Not you, Lord"]to the revelation from Christ that he would die at the hands of sinful men and be raised up by the Father, “Get behind me Satan, for what you propose is from men and not from God”
So from your point of view, how does the DiVinci Code pervert the true and pure intention of Christ who most certainly would have responded to the filming of this stupid movie, “Get behind me Satan”?
For what you espouse as heresy is of men and not of God is what I conclude. How do you respond?
And can anyone name any one of the “Divine Mysteries of Christ” that has not been attacked by espousal of heretical men ie; Annunciation, Incarnation, Resurrection, Crucifixion, Nativity, Immaculate Conception, Redemption etc?
Is it absolutely true that from the time of Christ onward that Satan does not want us to accept literally the Divine Mysteries and so sows seeds of doubt and deceitful translations of the Biblical accounts handed to us from Saint Peter and the Apostles?