An Embarrassing History Lesson

Louie Verrecchio

by Louie Verrecchio on March 6, 2012 · 2 comments

Sr. Walsh went on to say that the Hyde Amendment “saves taxpayers from the ignominy of seeing their tax money used to end innocent lives.”

If only that were true! The bishops of all people should have known that Hyde is little more than an invitation to employ accounting trickery as taxpayer funded abortion was, and still is, taking place in the very shadow of USCCB headquarters in Washington, D.C. and numerous other Hyde-complaint states.

As it was, however, the Conference was so determined to see the socialist healthcare model become a fact of life in the United States that the overwhelming majority of bishops not only failed to teach the fullness of Catholic social doctrine, they also seemed to have forgotten who they were dealing with; namely, a man so Hell bent on promoting the culture of death that he voted against the “Illinois Born Alive Act” while still a state senator, a president whose first official act in office was rescinding the Mexico City Policy thereby freeing up Federal funds for overseas abortions, and an Administration that exhibits absolutely no moral compunction whatsoever in speaking of fetal mutilation as a matter of “reproductive health.”

Trusting that Obamacare would ever result in anything other than an exponential increase in assaults against innocent human life, in spite of whatever assurances may be given to the contrary, was clearly a fool’s bet from day one. And yet, so blinded by a predisposition for promoting big government social programs, the USCCB actually called on Congress (in the same 2009 letter mentioned above) to meet “President Obama’s challenge of barring the use of federal dollars for abortion and maintaining current conscience laws.”

“President Obama’s challenge?” Are you kidding me! This is nothing short of humiliating, at least it should be given the fact that Obama (to borrow the immortal words of Dennis Green) is who we thought he was. In other words, the president didn’t hoodwink the bishops; he arrived on Pennsylvania Avenue an unrepentant death merchant and he’s never given anyone a plausible reason to believe otherwise.

Strong medicine though this trip down Memory Lane may be, we need it for the simple reason that we must never forget what happens when a bishops’ conference loses its way; behaving more like a political action committee intent on pushing pet policy initiatives than as a body of Apostles determined to carry out the Divinely instituted mission of teaching the fullness of the faith, sanctifying the people of God and governing His Church.

All is not doom and gloom, however, as it appears as though the Conference may be taking steps to avoid the mistakes of the past.

For example, the USCCB website now states, “Bishops form their positions based on principles — here, religious liberty for all, and the life and dignity of every human person — not polls, personalities, or political parties.”

This statement suggests a marked improvement from the approach taken in 2009 when the bishops issued a press release saying, “A nationwide survey commissioned by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has found widespread public opposition to including abortion in health care reform and majority support for conscience rights protection — views shared by those who favor efforts to pass health care reform.”

One cannot help but marvel at the fact that the bishops were so determined to play in the inside-the-beltway sandbox that they simply announced to the world, without any hint of shame whatsoever, that they had just wasted God only knows how much of the faithful’s hard-earned money in the midst of an economic crisis on a meaningless public opinion poll, as though the faith that comes from the Apostles isn’t quite enough to defend the truth.

What if the polling data had shown that the majority of Americans stood against Divine truth, then what?

Well, I suppose we’re about to find out since recent data suggests that most self-described “Catholics” are happy to accept Obama’s free contraceptives. In fact, this may be precisely what brought about the Conference’s newfound awareness that public opinion polls are utterly irrelevant to their apostolic mission.

Pages: 1 2 3

  • Joe DeVet

    It is about time that these points be made public in so clear and compelling a way.  Thank you!

    Alas, I see no evidence that the bishops themselves recognize their own complicity in bringing about the present state of affairs.  Church leaders continue to assert that “universal coverage” [aka socialized medicine] is a proper objective based in our teachings.  Nor do I see any evidence that they are aware that, in regard to the harm inherent in socialized medicine, that as bad as the HHS mandate is, we ain’t seen nothing yet.  Wait till the full force of socialized medicine takes hold, and health care must be rationed in favor of preferred categories of citizens.  We have a tsunami of new life issues bearing down on us with destructive force, and the bishops seem unaware of it.  Have they not observed the harm brought about by N.I.C.E. in Britain or the euthanasia movement in Holland–both predictable adjuncts to socialized medicine?

    Without such politically-determined methods of rationing health-care coverage, a socialized-medicine scheme like Obamacare goes broke quickly.  (If care is rationed, it goes broke slowly–passing on the cleanup task to the next generation of politicians and citizens.)  Thus, it is inevitable that, for example, care will be massively withheld from the elderly.  The government can hardly resist this–it provides a double fiscal benefit.  From lack of health care the elderly die off early, thus freeing the system from giving them more care, AND they stop receiving Social Security payments, thus helping delay the bankruptcy of that system.  What an evil genius Obama is–and what hapless collaborators are the bishops of the USCCB!

  • Pingback: Convert Journal – Obama’s war on religion (update #4)