<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senator Max Baucus Wants to Teach Your Kids About Sex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catholicexchange.com/2009/12/09/124871/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/12/09/124871/</link>
	<description>Catholic News, Catholic Articles, Catholic Apologetics, Catholic Content, Catholic Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commander in Mischief &#124; Prayer And Action</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/12/09/124871/comment-page-1/#comment-44563</link>
		<dc:creator>Commander in Mischief &#124; Prayer And Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/?p=124871#comment-44563</guid>
		<description>[...] for Adulthood Programs.&quot; As Steven Mosher, President of Population Research Institute, tells us the section &quot;will supposedly teach kids &#8216;healthy life skills,&#8217; including things [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Adulthood Programs.&quot; As Steven Mosher, President of Population Research Institute, tells us the section &quot;will supposedly teach kids &#8216;healthy life skills,&#8217; including things [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goral</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/12/09/124871/comment-page-1/#comment-44430</link>
		<dc:creator>goral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/?p=124871#comment-44430</guid>
		<description>&quot;evidence-based effective programs, strong science&quot; This is the language of Baucus, SICKUS and all the rest of the deathocrats. They use it as it suits them.

If there is an obamanation in the making - it&#039;s democrats.
If there is anti-faith, anti-life legislation - it&#039;s democrats.
If there is spin, schizophrenia, fearmongering - yep, it&#039;s democrats.

Could it be that the soul of this once hyper moral party is now the soul of perdition that is bent on destroying this nation? 

Why are reasonable citizens still in it? No, the bigger question is why are faithful Catholics still in it??? Maybe, just maybe they are being faithful to the wrong god. 
It brings to mind the passage - &quot;Lord, didn&#039;t we prophecy in you Name?......&quot;
‘well yes Lord, but we were being cautious about “hypermorality”

(pause…….stare…….aaaaaahhhhh!!!!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;evidence-based effective programs, strong science&#8221; This is the language of Baucus, SICKUS and all the rest of the deathocrats. They use it as it suits them.</p>
<p>If there is an obamanation in the making &#8211; it&#8217;s democrats.<br />
If there is anti-faith, anti-life legislation &#8211; it&#8217;s democrats.<br />
If there is spin, schizophrenia, fearmongering &#8211; yep, it&#8217;s democrats.</p>
<p>Could it be that the soul of this once hyper moral party is now the soul of perdition that is bent on destroying this nation? </p>
<p>Why are reasonable citizens still in it? No, the bigger question is why are faithful Catholics still in it??? Maybe, just maybe they are being faithful to the wrong god.<br />
It brings to mind the passage &#8211; &#8220;Lord, didn&#8217;t we prophecy in you Name?&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;<br />
‘well yes Lord, but we were being cautious about “hypermorality”</p>
<p>(pause…….stare…….aaaaaahhhhh!!!!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpageinkeller</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/12/09/124871/comment-page-1/#comment-44428</link>
		<dc:creator>cpageinkeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/?p=124871#comment-44428</guid>
		<description>The various iterations of the &quot;health care&quot; bills are all bad for patients, bad for families, bad for doctors, and bad for the economy.  Though there is almost an unlimited spectrum of issues to which one might object in each of the bills, the &quot;personal responsibility&quot; amendment to the Bacus bill perhaps best represents the schizoid mentality of some legislators.

On the one hand, they claim that the government &quot;has no right in the bedroom;&quot; thus anything goes between consenting adults. They advocate a woman&#039;s &quot;right to choose&quot; - can&#039;t have government interfering here!  Right?  Clearly, can&#039;t have government intervening in issues of human sexuality!  Right?

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/12/senate_rejects_abortion_amendm.html?hpid=topnews 

On the other hand, the believe it is entirely appropriate for government to advocate, fund, and implement programs aimed at the very early sexualization (and secularization) of our children.

Schizoid indeed! Right is called wrong, and wrong is named right. Lies, repeated loudly and frequently enough, become &quot;truth.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The various iterations of the &#8220;health care&#8221; bills are all bad for patients, bad for families, bad for doctors, and bad for the economy.  Though there is almost an unlimited spectrum of issues to which one might object in each of the bills, the &#8220;personal responsibility&#8221; amendment to the Bacus bill perhaps best represents the schizoid mentality of some legislators.</p>
<p>On the one hand, they claim that the government &#8220;has no right in the bedroom;&#8221; thus anything goes between consenting adults. They advocate a woman&#8217;s &#8220;right to choose&#8221; &#8211; can&#8217;t have government interfering here!  Right?  Clearly, can&#8217;t have government intervening in issues of human sexuality!  Right?</p>
<p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/12/senate_rejects_abortion_amendm.html?hpid=topnews" rel="nofollow">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/12/senate_rejects_abortion_amendm.html?hpid=topnews</a> </p>
<p>On the other hand, the believe it is entirely appropriate for government to advocate, fund, and implement programs aimed at the very early sexualization (and secularization) of our children.</p>
<p>Schizoid indeed! Right is called wrong, and wrong is named right. Lies, repeated loudly and frequently enough, become &#8220;truth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

