- Catholic Exchange - http://catholicexchange.com -
The Cruelty of Casual Canonizations
Posted By Trent Beattie On October 20, 2009 @ 12:03 am In Today | 10 Comments
In recent years it has become commonplace to turn funerals into casual canonizations. “Bob is in a better place,” we’re told, which, if taken literally, can only mean Heaven, as neither Hell nor Purgatory are better places than earth. Never mind the fact that Bob wasn‘t very generous with his time or money, drank too much, rarely read Catholic books or listened to Catholic radio, and in his retirement, watched baseball and football games most of the day, to the detriment of his marriage. He did, however, get to Mass every Sunday, prayed a few times during the week, and managed to make a good confession before dying.
Hardly the stuff you’d find in Butler’s Lives of the Saints , yet we’re told that Bob is now in Heaven, which is another way of saying he’s a saint. After all, there are no other kinds of people in Heaven–either we’re perfected here below, or we have the job finished in Purgatory. You will not find in Heaven a bunch of saints on one side and a bunch of imperfect sinners on the other. No, in Heaven all are perfected , because God is Pure Holiness, and in His Presence nothing unholy can exist. “And there shall not enter into [Heaven] anything defiled,” we read in Revelation 21:27.
So those of us who die in a state of grace but are still in need of perfecting, will go through the pains of Purgatory before entering Heaven. St. Catherine of Genoa (1447-1510) bluntly stated after a vision that “The souls [in Purgatory] endure a torment so extreme that no tongue can describe it, nor could the understanding conceive the least notion of it, if God did not make it
known by a particular grace.” She even went so far as to say that the sufferings of Purgatory are “equal to those of Hell” (as far as intensity, not duration).
Because it is certain that the imperfect (which, in the absence of gaining a plenary indulgence, would include Bob) go through Purgatory before getting to Heaven, and because Purgatory is unimaginably painful, it is easy to see that casual canonizations are not at all compassionate, but are in fact very cruel. They deprive the faithful departed of many prayers and good works that could have helped them get through Purgatory sooner, and they encourage spiritual sloth in those present at the funeral. “If Bob is in Heaven, I don’t have to make too much of an effort to get there either,” one would logically think, if he believes the casual canonization to be true. “Pour me another beer…”
“But Bob was nice to me,” you say.
Bob may have been “nice” to you–that is, he may not have hurt your feelings, but your feelings are not the measure of someone else’s sanctity (or your own). We read from the Prophet Isaiah, “ For my thoughts are not your thoughts: nor are your ways my ways, says the Lord. As high as the heavens are above the earth, so high are my ways above your ways, and my thoughts above your thoughts.” (Isaiah 55:8-9). Our human standards fall infinitely short of Our Lord’s standards.
In fact, being “nice” was not endorsed by Our Lord, but He did declare charity to be an absolute requirement. (Cf. Matthew 22:37-39). St. Paul says that “if I have prophecy and know all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith so as to remove mountains, yet do not have charity, I am nothing.” (1 Corinthians 13:2). Without charity, we are nothing. Could it be stated more plainly?
With such an exacting requirement, we should know exactly what charity is: the theological virtue by which we love God above all else and our neighbor as ourselves for the love of God. Therefore, telling someone that his recent divorce and remarriage are okay may be “nice,” but it is most certainly not charitable. In other words, you may avoid hurting his feelings, but you encourage him to remain in grave sin, which, if done with deliberation and not repented of, will lead to everlasting misery in Hell. Not charitable at all.
The source and destination of charity is God. We get all our ability to be charitable from God, and all our charity is then directed back to God, either directly (in worship) or indirectly through others (in good works). Thus, someone who wants what is best for his neighbor will not lie to him, but will tell him the truth, which can help lead him to Heaven. In light of this, we see that Bob being “nice” to you may even have been a vice, not a virtue.
“But Bob was baptized,” you object.
The answer to that objection is found from the Fathers of the Council of Trent, who declared unequivocally that
If anyone says that after the reception of the grace of justification…guilt is so remitted and the debt of eternal punishment so blotted out to every repentant sinner, that no debt of temporal punishment remains to be discharged, either in this world or in Purgatory, before the gates of Heaven can be opened, let him be anathema. (Session 6, Chapter 16, Canon 30)
In other words, just because you’ve been baptized, doesn’t mean you go straight to Heaven when you die. (Baptized children who have not yet reached the age of reason and die, do go straight to Heaven, as they are not capable of committing personal sin.) A man who was baptized as an infant, but who goes on to live for many decades, will likely have much sin to deal with. Our friend Bob choose to live out his Catholicism halfheartedly, which is another way of saying that he sinned a lot. Deliberately contradicting God’s Will is by definition, sinning. While not an apostate, Bob was not a saint, either.
“But it must say in the liturgical books that you’re supposed to say something good about the deceased,” you suggest.
Actually, there is no such instruction in the liturgical books, and in fact, there is an explicit directive to refrain from eulogies. The priest is clearly told in Number 382 of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM) that “At the Funeral Mass there should, as a rule, be a short homily, but never a eulogy of any kind.” In other words, no casual canonizations.
Funerals are not a time to celebrate how wonderful we are, but a time to ponder how wonderful God is. St. Louis de Montfort (1673-1716) observed that
We are naturally prouder than peacocks, more groveling than toads…more envious than serpents, more gluttonous than hogs, more furious than tigers, lazier than tortoises, weaker than reeds, and more capricious than weathervanes. We have within ourselves nothing but nothingness and sin, and we deserve nothing but the anger of God and everlasting Hell.
When was the last time you heard that in a homily?
The fact that we’re sinners may not be pleasant, but once acknowledged, we can get on with living a truly holy life. How so? When we know our own weakness, we can then ask God for help. We can live in Him, rather than hopelessly trying to do it on our own. As St. Therese of Lisieux (1873-1897) asked, “If you are nothing, do you forget that Jesus is everything?” Then she added, “You have only to lose your nothingness in His infinity and think only of loving Him.”
Funerals, like the rest of life, are about God first, us second–and the second part only has meaning insofar as we live in God. So we pray for the deceased and remember that one day we will die as well–a thought which leads us to prepare properly by doing penance, all the while trusting in the boundless Mercy of God.
“But God is merciful–you just said so. Then why can’t we go straight to Heaven?” you ask.
We can go straight to Heaven. The problem is, most of us do not will to do so. God’s grace is never lacking, but our interest in His grace often is. Those who are not at all interested, do not pray at all; those who are somewhat interested, pray sometimes; those who are very interested pray regularly. Humble and persistent prayer for the light to know and the strength to do God’s Will is essential for someone who wants to go straight to Heaven after death. St. Teresa of Avila (1515-1582) says that
Those who give themselves to prayer should concentrate solely on this: the conformity of their wills with the Divine Will. They should be convinced that this constitutes their highest perfection. The more fully they practice this, the greater the gifts they will receive from God, and the greater the progress they will make in the interior life.
St. Alphonsus Liguori (1696-1787) explains further that
…to save one’s soul without prayer is most difficult and even…impossible, according to the ordinary course of God’s providence. But by praying our salvation is made secure…What does it cost us to say, ‘My God, help me! Lord, assist me! have mercy on me!’ Is there anything easier than this? And this little will suffice to save us, if we will be diligent in doing it…
…let us understand, that if we do not pray, we have no excuse, because the grace of prayer is given to everyone. It is in our power to pray whenever we will…God gives to all the grace of prayer, in order that thereby they may obtain every help, and even more than they need, for keeping the divine law, and for persevering until death. If we are not saved, the whole fault will be ours; and we shall have our own failure to answer for, because we did not pray.
What is true with salvation in general is true with going straight to Heaven in particular. God is always willing to provide us with all we need, so if we do not go straight to Heaven, we can blame no one but ourselves, because we did not pray as well or as often as we should have. Let us remedy this problem by giving more attention to prayer, or, if necessary, start praying again. Then after a life of virtue, a real canonization may be in order for us. In the absence of such virtue, we can conclude that casual canonizations are cruel, not compassionate.
(Adapted from the article that originally appeared in [1] Catholic Men’s Quarterly [1] )
Article printed from Catholic Exchange: http://catholicexchange.com
URL to article: http://catholicexchange.com/2009/10/20/122636/
URLs in this post:
[1] : http://www.houseonthemoor.com/
[2] : http://www.amazon.com/Purgatory-Explained-S-J-F-X-Schouppe/dp/0895558319/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256084998&sr=8-3
Click here to print.
Copyright © 2009 Catholic Exchange. All rights reserved.
10 Comments To "The Cruelty of Casual Canonizations"
#1 Comment By DWC On October 20, 2009 @ 12:09 pm
I am a full blooded purgatory accepter (okay, we all are here ….) – but believe that even though the purification is painful .. it is still better than earth … as we are closer to our heavenly father — in fact we can feel Him closer, but the door is not fully opened yet. Maybe purgatory only last a minute …. but a heavenly minute may “feel” like a 1,000 years. Still, this pain, is loving pain. We see and understand.
#2 Comment By Terri Kimmel On October 20, 2009 @ 12:24 pm
I agree that Purgatory is most likely a better place than earth. Maybe I’m deluded, but I imagine it a place with fewer distractions. I am also fully convinced that overcoming compulsive sin is just as difficult in Purgatory as it is here. There is no less work in Purgatory, just a better work environment.
This is a great piece. It needed to be written. I’ve always been bothered by the concept of ignoring Purgatory. I envision it to be a good place, immersed in the painful, yet cleansing and healing fires of purification. I hope I go straight to Heaven, that’s my goal, but I’m not afraid if I don’t. AND I hope the whole world is praying for me because longing for Heaven in this life is bad enough. Being able to see it and not being able to enter is agony even to consider, much less endure.
#3 Comment By goral On October 20, 2009 @ 12:49 pm
To all of us who have some affinity for Purgatory keep in mind the words of St. Catherine of Genoa. I’m after all the indulgences I can get. There’s a reason the Church offers them.
I think of Purgatory as a jail for transgressions. I can’t see a spiritual jail being even remotely comparable to this life with it’s opportunities for holiness.
Recently we had a nationally televised funeral where the homilist in persona Christi made the statement that Christ said to the deceased – “well done my good and faithful servant”.
Straight to Heaven is a Protestant heresy that is sometimes clothed in catholic garments.
#4 Comment By consecrata On October 20, 2009 @ 1:43 pm
I believe in Purgatory as a place of cleansing and purification, but the method is not known for sure since different Saints have different views and visions of Purgatory. Perhaps it is an immense longing for God, for complete and unrestricted union with Him, but which is temporarily denied causing much pain and suffering…
#5 Comment By NovusOrdoSeclorum On October 20, 2009 @ 3:40 pm
I think that, as described in the article, Purgatory is a lot worse than Earth. On earth it is our choice whether we want to do penance for our sins now or just kick back and relax. I think it is most appropriate that reparation on earth for sins is easier than reparation in Purgatory. In a sense God gives us credit for doing it on our own initiative on earth rather than at the last minute when we have to in Purgatory.
I don’t think that people in Purgatory have a happy feeling because they are going to heaven soon. Rather, I think they see clearly the enormity of their offenses against God–even those they considered minor on earth–and they are horrified.
#6 Comment By SeanReynoldsNZ On October 20, 2009 @ 4:07 pm
I remember listening to Scott Hahn talking about his conversion, and his description was that the souls in Purgatory suffer in a way that is so powerful that we on Earth cannot comprehend, and yet, they experience a joy that we on Earth cannot comprehend. The pain they suffer is that they are without God because they still have too much self-love, yet they are joyous because they see the light at the end of the tunnel.
It is not where we are meant to spend eternity, but the Church does not teach that. It is a consolation “prize”. I’d rather wait for the end of the world in Purgatory than Hell, because at the end of time I would get to Heaven. But I would rather skip Purgatory by the way I live on Earth. At least, I say that. The way I live would suggest otherwise.
#7 Comment By plowshare On October 20, 2009 @ 8:12 pm
I am glad Louis de Montfort’s assertion (which does NOT have the force of doctrine, even though it was made by many other saints) that “We have within ourselves nothing but nothingness and sin, and we deserve nothing but the anger of God and everlasting Hell.” is not preached much if at all.
The first part is illogical if taken literally–if we have to credit everything good in us to the grace of God, then why do we have to take the blame for anything bad rather than laying the blame on Satan?
The second part is based on the weak (though also asserted by quite a few saints) assumption that the slightest offense against the law of God is deserving of the infinite agonies of hell, simply because God is infinite. That claim blots out the distinction between mortal and venial sins, so it is certainly not a part of Catholic doctrine.
The Jews who believe in an afterlife generally think that the agonies of hell are finite, that after a certain time the evildoer is annihilated. That certainly seems more humane to me than everlasting torment.
Actually, I don’t believe hell is a place of unrelieved torment either. I think just the knowledge that one has lost God forever is enough punishment.
#8 Comment By Michael On October 20, 2009 @ 8:32 pm
A great book on the subject is [2]. It was out of print a few years ago but looks like it may be back in print. Still, save yourself a few bucks and buy a used copy for yourself and one to give away. It’s well worth it.
In Christ,
Michael
#9 Comment By nathan.faucher On October 20, 2009 @ 9:14 pm
I could think of any number of comments to post regarding this article, but the only thing that comes to mind is just that this article is plain amazing. It’s so nice to see an article about Purgatory. Having been a cantor, and with my wife being a cantor, we both have been exposed to so many catholic funerals where the priest, let alone the people, give people the false hope that their loved one is already in Heaven with God.
I guess I cannot resist leaving my own thoughts, though they mirror the other comments. It’s impossible for us to contemplate the horrors and the joys of Purgatory. I think the hardest part is that God is as distant from us as He ever has been, because we are simply going through all the things we did contrary to His Will. Yet all through that, we know that we wouldn’t be experiencing the horror and pain of Purgatory if we did not willingly choose to be there. Because of that choice, we get to keep hope of seeing God, because we know that we will see God.
I recognize the simplicity of my comments, but there is just far too much, and we could all go on forever discussing and debating the mysteries of Purgatory.
#10 Comment By sspxfan On October 21, 2009 @ 12:55 am
This excellent article reminds me of a similar kind of cruelty. Some pre-Vatican-II papal documents that I’ve read insist that Limbo is real. The Fourth Lateran Council teaches that to go to Heaven, a soul must have sanctifying grace. But aborted babies don’t get sanctifying grace, since they don’t get baptism of any kind. On EWTN, I’ve heard to professional psychotherapists say that they tell post-abortion mothers that they’ll see their aborted babies in Heaven. If unbaptized babies go to Limbo, those therapists are giving post-abortion mothers false hope. Limbo is not Heaven, and if anyone goes to Limbo, he stays there forever.
I’m what many would call an ultratraditionalist. So I practice Catholicism the way Roman Rite Catholics practiced it before Vatican II. That’s partly why I felt deeply troubled when I read that the International Theological Commission was debating whether the Church’s teaching about Limbo is true. I’m hoping and praying the Church will return to the way she was before Vatican II.