<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most Americans Want Health Care Reform, Oppose Abortion Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catholicexchange.com/2009/09/24/121997/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/09/24/121997/</link>
	<description>Catholic News, Catholic Articles, Catholic Apologetics, Catholic Content, Catholic Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe DeVet</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/09/24/121997/comment-page-1/#comment-42908</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe DeVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/?p=121997#comment-42908</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a piece of cake to find a majority who support &quot;efforts to pass health care reform which provides affordable insurance for all.&quot;  Who would not want that?  

However, the question itself is disingenuous, since it does not specify what efforts, by whom, and what the trade-offs are.  In the context of the present debate, it implicitly supports the present dash toward socialized medicine.

Apparently, 40% of the respondents weren&#039;t fooled.  That&#039;s encouraging, since who would not want the sugared outcome implied by the question?

What&#039;s definitely not encouraging is that the USCCB is promoting, directly or indirectly, the rush to Obamacare.  The shameful stipulation, that the program be &quot;abortion-neutral&quot; may be promised but it should be noted that such an outcome will never happen if the &quot;reform&quot; gets passed under the present administration and congress.  Even if it turns out to be truly &quot;abortion-neutral&quot;, I predict that the USCCB will rue the day it lent its support to this evil initiative.

&quot;Blind guides!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a piece of cake to find a majority who support &#8220;efforts to pass health care reform which provides affordable insurance for all.&#8221;  Who would not want that?  </p>
<p>However, the question itself is disingenuous, since it does not specify what efforts, by whom, and what the trade-offs are.  In the context of the present debate, it implicitly supports the present dash toward socialized medicine.</p>
<p>Apparently, 40% of the respondents weren&#8217;t fooled.  That&#8217;s encouraging, since who would not want the sugared outcome implied by the question?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s definitely not encouraging is that the USCCB is promoting, directly or indirectly, the rush to Obamacare.  The shameful stipulation, that the program be &#8220;abortion-neutral&#8221; may be promised but it should be noted that such an outcome will never happen if the &#8220;reform&#8221; gets passed under the present administration and congress.  Even if it turns out to be truly &#8220;abortion-neutral&#8221;, I predict that the USCCB will rue the day it lent its support to this evil initiative.</p>
<p>&#8220;Blind guides!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

