<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg: Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/10/120229/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/10/120229/</link>
	<description>Catholic News, Catholic Articles, Catholic Apologetics, Catholic Content, Catholic Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CELEBRATION, HURRAY! &#171; The DREW BLOG</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/10/120229/comment-page-1/#comment-41664</link>
		<dc:creator>CELEBRATION, HURRAY! &#171; The DREW BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/?p=120229#comment-41664</guid>
		<description>[...] a&#160;Comment       Yippee, we&#8217;ve got another woman Supreme Court justice. After all, the first two women were so freakin&#8217; brilliant. (Some of these idiot females in politics are really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a&nbsp;Comment       Yippee, we&#8217;ve got another woman Supreme Court justice. After all, the first two women were so freakin&#8217; brilliant. (Some of these idiot females in politics are really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg: Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations &#124; OrthodoxNet.com Blog &#124; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/10/120229/comment-page-1/#comment-41176</link>
		<dc:creator>Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg: Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations &#124; OrthodoxNet.com Blog &#124; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/?p=120229#comment-41176</guid>
		<description>[...] Court Justice Ginsburg: Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations  Catholic Exchange &#124; Kathleen Gilbert &#124; July 10, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court Justice Ginsburg: Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations  Catholic Exchange | Kathleen Gilbert | July 10, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri Kimmel</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/10/120229/comment-page-1/#comment-41130</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri Kimmel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/?p=120229#comment-41130</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a link to the interview in the NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html

True to form for mainstream feminism, Ginsber&#039;s philosophies are twisted by arrogance and contradiction.  How is that women deserve equality, but it&#039;s okay to write off the lives of the unborn?  Either there is such a thing as personhood or there is not.  Sexual &quot;freedom&quot; is a losing proposition, anyway you look at it.  Basing any kind of ethic on so-called sexual freedom is foolishness.  There will ever and always be victims.  There will never be integrity in any feminist policy until those two issues (chastity and personhood) are rectified.

There are some legitimate cases cited in the interview.  Women do deserve to have our feminine dignity protected by the law.  We deserve to BE women (not mere imitators of men), to have a feminine perspective, to have a care ethic, to love our children and families--and at the same time to have all the legitimate freedoms of any other American citizen.

I never wanted to be a feminist.  I&#039;ve been coerced by a grievous lack of vision or leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a link to the interview in the NY Times:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html</a></p>
<p>True to form for mainstream feminism, Ginsber&#8217;s philosophies are twisted by arrogance and contradiction.  How is that women deserve equality, but it&#8217;s okay to write off the lives of the unborn?  Either there is such a thing as personhood or there is not.  Sexual &#8220;freedom&#8221; is a losing proposition, anyway you look at it.  Basing any kind of ethic on so-called sexual freedom is foolishness.  There will ever and always be victims.  There will never be integrity in any feminist policy until those two issues (chastity and personhood) are rectified.</p>
<p>There are some legitimate cases cited in the interview.  Women do deserve to have our feminine dignity protected by the law.  We deserve to BE women (not mere imitators of men), to have a feminine perspective, to have a care ethic, to love our children and families&#8211;and at the same time to have all the legitimate freedoms of any other American citizen.</p>
<p>I never wanted to be a feminist.  I&#8217;ve been coerced by a grievous lack of vision or leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tntmnm</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/10/120229/comment-page-1/#comment-41127</link>
		<dc:creator>tntmnm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/?p=120229#comment-41127</guid>
		<description>So Medicaid does not cover abortions? OK, just wait for Obahma-Care. Abortion and assisted suicide will be covered 100%. Think of the money that will be saved instead of &#039;expensive&#039; life saving care!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Medicaid does not cover abortions? OK, just wait for Obahma-Care. Abortion and assisted suicide will be covered 100%. Think of the money that will be saved instead of &#8216;expensive&#8217; life saving care!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Jewell</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/10/120229/comment-page-1/#comment-41124</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Jewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/?p=120229#comment-41124</guid>
		<description>Of Ruth Bader &quot;Margaret Eugenic Sanger&quot; Ginsburg I find a &#039;the member of a group “that we don’t want to have too many of.”&#039; Indeed, want and surely need NONE of: that is, elitist, oligarchic, post-modern know-nothing-know-it-alls; aka &#039;one more trying and tiring pompous ass&#039;. I don&#039;t suggest aborting Ruthie - just deep-sixing her judicial career by forceful impeachment. She has earned it over and over again, just from legislators who are, or at least should be, tired of her complicity in legislating from the bench. Toss in her recommendation that American jurisprudence ought to be taking effective signals from just any old court in any old place that suits such as Ruthie.

Surely, that &#039;population we don&#039;t want, let alone have too many of&#039;, is that population that points at other populations as unwantedly expendable. And, oh, the utter arrogance, to come out and say such things publicly: that we should work to eugenically cleanse humanity . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of Ruth Bader &#8220;Margaret Eugenic Sanger&#8221; Ginsburg I find a &#8216;the member of a group “that we don’t want to have too many of.”&#8217; Indeed, want and surely need NONE of: that is, elitist, oligarchic, post-modern know-nothing-know-it-alls; aka &#8216;one more trying and tiring pompous ass&#8217;. I don&#8217;t suggest aborting Ruthie &#8211; just deep-sixing her judicial career by forceful impeachment. She has earned it over and over again, just from legislators who are, or at least should be, tired of her complicity in legislating from the bench. Toss in her recommendation that American jurisprudence ought to be taking effective signals from just any old court in any old place that suits such as Ruthie.</p>
<p>Surely, that &#8216;population we don&#8217;t want, let alone have too many of&#8217;, is that population that points at other populations as unwantedly expendable. And, oh, the utter arrogance, to come out and say such things publicly: that we should work to eugenically cleanse humanity . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg: Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations &#124; Pelican Project Pro-Life</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/10/120229/comment-page-1/#comment-41112</link>
		<dc:creator>Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg: Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations &#124; Pelican Project Pro-Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/?p=120229#comment-41112</guid>
		<description>[...] See original here: Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg: Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See original here: Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg: Roe Would Help Eradicate Unwanted Populations [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

