<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opening Pandora’s Box: Classifying CO2 as a &#8220;Pollutant&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/</link>
	<description>Catholic News, Catholic Articles, Catholic Apologetics, Catholic Content, Catholic Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: guitarmom</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/comment-page-1/#comment-40493</link>
		<dc:creator>guitarmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/#comment-40493</guid>
		<description>Now that CO2 has been declared a pollutant, the government will be able to regulate anything that produces CO2. What a &quot;lovely&quot; way to institute population control mechanisms through the back door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that CO2 has been declared a pollutant, the government will be able to regulate anything that produces CO2. What a &#8220;lovely&#8221; way to institute population control mechanisms through the back door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkanabar Ilarsadin</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/comment-page-1/#comment-40491</link>
		<dc:creator>Arkanabar Ilarsadin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/#comment-40491</guid>
		<description>The actual motivation behind the global warming scare is power, pure and simple.  If one can demand that energy production be reduced, one can, in essence, demand that the poor die earlier and more frequently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actual motivation behind the global warming scare is power, pure and simple.  If one can demand that energy production be reduced, one can, in essence, demand that the poor die earlier and more frequently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/comment-page-1/#comment-40472</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/#comment-40472</guid>
		<description>As a Catholic and Father to ten children I am gravely concerned that those who promote that man is causing climate-to-change agenda are gravely misled.  Their agenda, it is clear to me, is one about reducing the world&#039;s population and not at all all about science.  The facts in this debate are now said to have been decided and that man is altering the climate.  When thoughtful scientists refute this notion with valid data, they are not considered.

And with every fiber of my being I know that the agenda promoting human-caused climate change and specifically carbon dioxide is a red herring designed to bring about social changes in our society that would look towards reducing the world&#039;s population.  When God said to be fruitful and multiply and our Church teaches us to be open to as many children as possible, He means it.  

For more information on what many of the world&#039;s scientists believe about this I encourage to read the information at this website. 

http://www.petitionproject.org 

There you will find a lot of information and more than 31,000 scientists have signed a petition which states: 

&quot;We urge the United State government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997 and any other similar proposals.  The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology and damage the health and welfare of mankind. 

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth&#039;s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth&#039;s climate.  Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produces many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Catholic and Father to ten children I am gravely concerned that those who promote that man is causing climate-to-change agenda are gravely misled.  Their agenda, it is clear to me, is one about reducing the world&#8217;s population and not at all all about science.  The facts in this debate are now said to have been decided and that man is altering the climate.  When thoughtful scientists refute this notion with valid data, they are not considered.</p>
<p>And with every fiber of my being I know that the agenda promoting human-caused climate change and specifically carbon dioxide is a red herring designed to bring about social changes in our society that would look towards reducing the world&#8217;s population.  When God said to be fruitful and multiply and our Church teaches us to be open to as many children as possible, He means it.  </p>
<p>For more information on what many of the world&#8217;s scientists believe about this I encourage to read the information at this website. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.petitionproject.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.petitionproject.org</a> </p>
<p>There you will find a lot of information and more than 31,000 scientists have signed a petition which states: </p>
<p>&#8220;We urge the United State government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997 and any other similar proposals.  The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology and damage the health and welfare of mankind. </p>
<p>There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth&#8217;s climate.  Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produces many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe DeVet</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/comment-page-1/#comment-40470</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe DeVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/#comment-40470</guid>
		<description>The whole &quot;climate change&quot; spectacle unfolds like a slow-motion train wreck, and one watches in rapt horror and helplessness as car after car of right reason gets derailed in turn.

The whole wreck began 30 or so years ago with breathless reports that the &quot;science&quot; was showing a new ICE AGE coming upon us.  It was scary, but as time went on this story took its place alongside the many environmental scares and hoaxes that have been visited upon us (some of which are included in the article.)  One wonders when the people will wake up and ask questions, like what exactly was the Alar scare based upon, which had us all up in arms and then disappeared without a trace?  Or whatever happened to the global cooling scare which terrified us all in the 1970&#039;s?  Or what became of the mass deaths from starvation, scarcity, and environmental disaster that the Club of Rome predicted back in the 1970&#039;s would take place in the decade we now live in?

We now learn that the &quot;2500 scientists&quot; who supposedly author the UN climate reports don&#039;t all sign onto the report summaries, which drive the media accounts.  This because the final reports are done by the POLITICAL editors, who pick and choose from varied climate models the data which support the political agenda they want to pursue.  We learn that there are thousands of scientists who disbelieve the scary climate predictions, but their dissent is not reported.  We watch as the UN scales down their dire predictions, but the scaled-down predictions (e.g., lower predicted rises in sea levels) are headlined by the media as if they were new and more dire revelations.

One feels as if one fell down a dark rabbit-hole and woke up in Wonderland.  What is true is what the Queen of Hearts says is so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole &#8220;climate change&#8221; spectacle unfolds like a slow-motion train wreck, and one watches in rapt horror and helplessness as car after car of right reason gets derailed in turn.</p>
<p>The whole wreck began 30 or so years ago with breathless reports that the &#8220;science&#8221; was showing a new ICE AGE coming upon us.  It was scary, but as time went on this story took its place alongside the many environmental scares and hoaxes that have been visited upon us (some of which are included in the article.)  One wonders when the people will wake up and ask questions, like what exactly was the Alar scare based upon, which had us all up in arms and then disappeared without a trace?  Or whatever happened to the global cooling scare which terrified us all in the 1970&#8242;s?  Or what became of the mass deaths from starvation, scarcity, and environmental disaster that the Club of Rome predicted back in the 1970&#8242;s would take place in the decade we now live in?</p>
<p>We now learn that the &#8220;2500 scientists&#8221; who supposedly author the UN climate reports don&#8217;t all sign onto the report summaries, which drive the media accounts.  This because the final reports are done by the POLITICAL editors, who pick and choose from varied climate models the data which support the political agenda they want to pursue.  We learn that there are thousands of scientists who disbelieve the scary climate predictions, but their dissent is not reported.  We watch as the UN scales down their dire predictions, but the scaled-down predictions (e.g., lower predicted rises in sea levels) are headlined by the media as if they were new and more dire revelations.</p>
<p>One feels as if one fell down a dark rabbit-hole and woke up in Wonderland.  What is true is what the Queen of Hearts says is so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/comment-page-1/#comment-40468</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/#comment-40468</guid>
		<description>Actually, dihydrogen monoxide is one of the more deadly chemicals out there--hundred die annual from it--and very powerful solvent.  Come to think of it, Oxygen is a pretty nasty chemical too.

I wonder how many people realize that &quot;dry ice&quot; is frozen CO2.  And that they breathe out CO2.  The reason why plants that are talked to on a regular basis look just a little better than the ones simply stuck in the window and ignored is because when you talk to the plants, they are getting a CO2 boost--something which all plants appreciate.

I can&#039;t understand why the &quot;greens&quot; don&#039;t love it all the CO2 out there.  It&#039;s good for the trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, dihydrogen monoxide is one of the more deadly chemicals out there&#8211;hundred die annual from it&#8211;and very powerful solvent.  Come to think of it, Oxygen is a pretty nasty chemical too.</p>
<p>I wonder how many people realize that &#8220;dry ice&#8221; is frozen CO2.  And that they breathe out CO2.  The reason why plants that are talked to on a regular basis look just a little better than the ones simply stuck in the window and ignored is because when you talk to the plants, they are getting a CO2 boost&#8211;something which all plants appreciate.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t understand why the &#8220;greens&#8221; don&#8217;t love it all the CO2 out there.  It&#8217;s good for the trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Kochan</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/comment-page-1/#comment-40454</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Kochan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/11/119402/#comment-40454</guid>
		<description>I’m sure they will get around to regulating water vapor.  All they have to do is convince the public of the grave dangers of hydrogen oxide or dihydrogen monoxide (sounds even scarier) pollution. http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m sure they will get around to regulating water vapor.  All they have to do is convince the public of the grave dangers of hydrogen oxide or dihydrogen monoxide (sounds even scarier) pollution. <a href="http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

