By His Fruits You Shall Know Him: A Defense of Christopher West

June 11th, 2009 by Matthew Pinto Print This Article Print This Article ·

Over the past few weeks, I have watched a friend and fellow soldier in the Church get assaulted by his own troops, ironically due to his breakthrough appearance on ABC News’ Nightline, the kind of program we in the Catholic media have long been targeting as an instrument for communicating Catholic teaching in general, and Pope John Paul II’s Theology of the Body (TOB) message in particular.

As one of his publishers (along with the Daughters of St. Paul and Servant/St. Anthony’s Messenger), I have witnessed firsthand the dynamic impact Christopher West is having on people worldwide, both married and single. Few Catholic authors/evangelists can match his track record of eyes opened to Truth and hearts turned to Christ. Fewer still have shown the courage to battle the colossal dragon that is modern society’s dissolute sexual culture, a beast that threatens to devour the souls in its path, including those of our children.

When Archbishop Sheen would be told by agitators back in his day that they had left the Faith, he would reportedly reply, “Oh, what was your sin?” Most, undoubtedly, were sexual in nature, for the Church’s message of sexual restraint has never been an easy teaching. But here Christopher comes forward with an urgent message of sexual healing and renewal from the very heart of the Church, and he is vilified by certain quarters of the Catholic apostolate. All one can do is marvel.

Breathtaking Results

Christopher, to a degree far greater than any other Catholic evangelist I have known in my 19 years of full-time ministry, is helping to heal people’s sexual wounds and correct their errors and misinterpretations of Church teaching. To read the testimonials we at Ascension Press receive each week in response to his books and conferences is to understand how positive an impact this man is having on people’s lives. The principles of Pope John Paul’s texts that Christopher is popularizing are stimulating vocations to consecrated life, strengthening youth, saving marriages, and saving babies worldwide.

Each year, more than 55,000 engaged persons in over 40 dioceses are being introduced to the authentic Catholic vision for marriage contained in Christopher’s marriage preparation program. Of the 91% who have entered the program sexually active, more than half of these couples said they will forego ongoing sexual relations until they are married. Nearly a third of these couples state that they will employ “Natural Family Planning” methods once they are married. And fully 61% made a deeper commitment to Christ because of the program. This is powerful evangelization.

Moreover, tens of thousands of college students on both Catholic and secular campuses have heard, perhaps for the first time, what “sexual freedom” really means! Cardinals and bishops from around the U.S. have invited Christopher to address the priests in their dioceses, and as a result, more than 3,600 priests in 31 dioceses have been given new tools to minister to a Catholic community that has, by and large, jettisoned much of the Catholic sexual ethic. The most consistent comment in surveys of these priests has been: “This was the single best continuing education day I have experienced in my entire priesthood.”

More than 25 bishops have taken time from their busy schedules to attend day-long seminars given by Christopher. One Midwestern bishop said after a seminar — and in front of a crowd of 600 — that Christopher is simply “one of the best Catholic evangelists in the Church today.”

Beyond that, more than 1,100 lay church leaders have attended Christopher’s weeklong course at the Theology of the Body Institute — and have given him an approval rating of over 96%. These leaders emerge substantially equipped to run TOB studies at their parishes, spreading John Paul II’s urgent message even deeper into the Catholic grassroots.

And these statistics do not even include the tens of thousands who have undertaken a personal or group study of the TOB via West’s books and workbooks — which bear Imprimaturs from bishops such as Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, Sean Cardinal O’Malley of Boston, and Justin Cardinal Rigali of Philadelphia.

As we know from the Acts of the Apostles, if a work is not of God, it will fail (5:38-39). Yet in this time of historic sexual anarchy, Christopher’s critics remain disinclined to attribute his overwhelmingly positive results to a blessing by God.

Distinct Mission and Voice

Christopher gets criticized by some for focusing too much on “sex: the verb,” though most who intimately know his work recognize that it focuses on the entire catechetical breadth of the TOB. For most of the Nightline interview, at which I was present, Christopher shared the pope’s vision about “sex: the noun.” But he was stung by hyper-aggressive editing in the final product, and has surely learned a lesson for future broadcast interviews. Despite the incoming fire, he should not avoid these television opportunities going forward. Any occasion to introduce millions of souls to Pope John Paul’s sublime teaching during this time of crisis simply must be seized.

This said, it should be noted that Christopher’s mission is different from others who teach and evangelize within the Catholic world. He is endeavoring to reach the vast majority of Catholics, including those who have not darkened the door of a church for years, the group comprising the “walking wounded” who have made bad choices in the past, or those who have grown up secretly thinking that their bodies or sex are somehow bad. This is an important part of West’s audience and reaching them is not easily accomplished. The sexual apologetics offered by many who have criticized Christopher will simply not reach, to any measurable degree, the wife who feels used by her husband, the man who has allowed impure habits to dominate his life, or the millions who view Catholicism as hopelessly repressive.

Given the sensitivity of the topics he addresses and the sheer volume of words he expresses in public, it is only natural that Christopher will occasionally answer questions or communicate ideas in ways that he will later need to refine. But he has never, and will never, reject a single teaching of the Catholic Church. The alleged “problems” in West’s presentations amount to issues of style, not doctrine.

A highly respected Catholic bishop and scholar once counseled Christopher with these words: “They will expect perfection of you.” This has certainly proven to be the case. But combating it by standing at podiums with scholarly paper in hand is not an option for a man who wants to connect with the vast audience of Desperate Housewives. As Jules Van Schaijik of The Personalist’s Project, said, “Attempting to anticipate all objections and prevent all possible misunderstandings would sap the life and sparkle from his talks. What he might gain in precision and clarity would be lost in effectiveness.”

There is no question that many in the Church are still very uncomfortable discussing the subject of sex. But while millions are drowning in a sea of filth advanced by our sexually-twisted media culture, Christopher is one of very few hazarding a high seas rescue mission and giving people a hand into the boat. Never has such a mission been so badly needed. Within the next 10 years, probably half the states in the U.S. will have embraced same-sex marriage. Already, most Catholics of child-bearing age have rejected Church teaching on contraception. And on this very day, more than 3,600 children will be killed in their mother’s womb. Yet some of our fellow Catholics have felt it important to spend their energies publicly lancing one of their own.

It is a fact that many of the Church’s most exalted figures also encountered their greatest resistance from within Church ranks. A comforting thought for a man carrying very heavy water in the cultural wildfire that threatens us all.

[CE Editor's note: Although we have accepted two submissions in the past two weeks that are defensive of Christopher West, CE is not taking sides in the ongoing debate.]

Matthew Pinto is the president of Ascension Press and the author, co-author, or editor of 11 books.



  • Terri Kimmel

    “Given the sensitivity of the topics he addresses and the sheer volume of words he expresses in public, it is only natural that Christopher will occasionally answer questions or communicate ideas in ways that he will later need to refine. But he has never, and will never, reject a single teaching of the Catholic Church. The alleged ‘problems’ in West’s presentations amount to issues of style, not doctrine.”

    Aha! So we should take what he says in context with his fidelity to Catholic teaching and all the other things he’s said? Imagine that! I think that’s quite reasonable.

    For what it’s worth, I’m a HUGE fan of Christopher West. I try to speak relevant, culturally-accessible truths about abortion and get blasted for it all the time too. I can relate, though my troubles are not nearly on the same scale. :)

    I am grateful that Christopher West is persistent and dedicated to his mission of mercy. It must seem thankless much of the time. We have a bookshelf full of his books at our house. We even have multiple copies of some so we can give them away.

  • markpennington

    Every successful person knows the value of time management, of cutting your effort short once the substantial goal has been obtained, in order to reach a higher goal. I suggest we cut short any further criticism of Christopher West. While millions and millions of our fellow souls are trapped in a snare that only entangles them further upon their struggle, we are wasting precious energy judging and complaining. Of all the criticism I’ve read, each point sounds as though the author is merely clammoring for recognition of his extended education and perfect knowledge that supposedly far surpasses Christopher West’s. Okay, you win– you’re all X-percent smarter than Christopher West. But I never heard of you. You weren’t in the streets of my neighborhood calling all in a language they heard and a manner they received. You know who was? Christopher West. He’s a man who has worked tirelessly, night after night, day after day, year after year speaking to groups as small as 2 and as large as 300 (that I’ve seen, maybe more elsewhere!)– bringing us back from the trap of premartial sex, and worse yet the trap of believing that the Catholic Church wanted something from us instead of trying to give something to us. Among my friends and I, it was rampant the excuses for not going to confession, the resentments at Catholic leaders who refused to learn a 2nd language so we could hear them. ‘Speak our language,’ we were told in typical double-speak, ‘we know everything.’ And then out of no where came Christopher West, joking with us, singing with us, calling us home to simply trust in Christ, attend Mass, go to confession, find a spiritual advisor, and oh by the way … it worked: we have changed our lives. Because of Christopher West’s introduction to Catholicism I have just completed the first year of a three year course taught by the archdiocese called The Catholic Ministry Institute. Whats next, you’re going to criticize the archdiocese? Because I find it highly unlikely that there is absolutely nothing in their courses that could be improved upon either. We study as best we can. We learn as best we can. And for the teachers I’m sure they teach as best they can. The rest, if we’ve entered into it committedly, prayerfully, humbly, is up to the Holy Spirit to guide us! And that, I’m sure, is not up for debate.

  • deirdrew

    This is interesting, but there seems to be such an emphasis on the BODY and not the integration of the other Catholic aspects.

    I don’t believe there is ‘theology of the body’ without all the other ‘theologies’ which get overlooked

    One needs to realize that evil is very strong, and when you try to take it on its own territoty, there’s going to be a huge war.

    Theology on Tap is great in some ways, but how many sins are committed in this endeavor? overdrinking, drinking and driving, etc

    Is Theology of the Body trying to get attention by focusing on the body, knowing THAT is what will get peoples’ attention?

    This is also why so much of our Teaching comes directly from the Church offices, because people WILL attack Catholicism.

    Some of these ‘modern’ things are shocking to older people perhaps because this is trying to live too much in the modern world.

  • deirdrew

    I’d like to add, my focus is not on ‘sex’ of whatever kind. It’s ‘the body’ aspect. There are so many words this West could have chosen, perhaps he does not now the history of modesty that using this word in this way violate in my opinion. Sure, it gets peoples’ attention – but it violates modesty which we all should have!!!!!!!

  • SeanReynoldsNZ

    I didn’t see the ABC News Nightline interview: I don’t know if it was broadcast in Australia. However, I did get to attend West’s talks at the World Youth Day in Sydney in 2008. People were queuing up for an hour or more to get into them.

    The main comment that I want to make about Christopher West is that he speaks in plain English, not academic language. He speaks very plainly and very directly about what the Church teaches in sexual morality. My wife and I were sitting next to someone who worked for the Anglican Diocese of Sydney during the first of the talks, and when he heard West defending what the Church teaches about contraception, he could see and understand the entire teaching.

    Compare this to the pre-marriage course I did through the Diocese of Hamilton, New Zealand. The people running the course presented the various methods of contraception in a moral vacuum, with the various couples in a discussion group to talk about the pros and cons of each method. My then fiance now wife had never seen me so fired up before while attempting to defend what the Church teaches.

    My last question is a challenge: Deirdrew, you seem to be suggesting that other stuff gets overlooked while dealing with the Theology of the Body. What are you suggesting that he overlooks? What I saw at World Youth Day touched on pretty much every aspect of Catholic Doctrine.

  • slbute

    What a great article! It was exactly what I was thinking when these attacks on Christopher began. How can scholarly people judge the whole of Christopher’s work on a seven minute sound bite on Nightline? The Church’s history is filled with prophets who were chastised by members of the Body of Christ for bolding going where no man had been. TOB is no different. God Bless C.West and God Bless Matt Pinto for defense of him on the crucial and effective work he is doing for Christ’s Church.

  • Pingback: By His Fruits You Shall Know Him: A Defense of Christopher West | General Education Programs | Programs: Education

  • Kathryn

    Sean:

    You forgot one little thing. Actually, I think it’s one of the reasons for West’s successes. He speaks plain English but he is happy–not just happy–but exstatic! about what he’s learned and wants to pass it on. His enthusiasm is infectious.

    I suspect West’s problems seems mostly “style” problems. I must confess, I prefer Janet Smith, a more sedate, more academic person. I did try to read John Paul II’s works. Couldn’t get through the first page.

    We need more people like West.

  • Kathryn

    One thing other thing I want to address: the author of the article states “Never has such a mission been so badly needed.”

    I think it would be more accurate to state that we haven’t been (culturally) where we currently are for nearly 2000 years. America is the new Roman Empire to some extent. Everything that we have: contraception, abortion, infanticide, homosexual behavior, an obsession with our pets, wars, terrorism–these are all things that existed in Rome in the early years of Christianity. So successful was the Church is putting a lid on these moral fires that we have forgotten–indeed, I think the hierarchy has forgotten!–all that our ancestors learned.

    I find it interesting that Jesus choose as his first leader a widower (still married?) fisherman, not a learned scribe. He choose someone who probably spoke very plain Hebrew.

  • StMichael Pray4us

    The people who are criticizing Christopher need to realize that his approach to explaining this very complex teaching is meant to reach “Joe six pack” in the pew. That’s me. I’m a man from the 1980′s, MTV, microwave generation. I had believed what the media reported about the church and it’s teachings. I never went any further in trying to find out and understand why the Church teaches what she does. I believed the lies that the media and our culture fed us for most of my life. I grew up., like most in my generation, thinking the church and it’s teachings on human sexuality was nuts. Christopher’s approach to explaining TOB gets my generation’s attention and helps lead us towards the truth. He shows us how we’ve been lied to our whole lives and have been taught, as he says, “to eat out of the dumpster” and believe that eating out of that dumpster is actually a good thing. His methods of teaching TOB is a light that breaks through the darkness of lies that have blinded us for so long. Once that light of truth breaks through, watch out! There’s no holding you back from pursuing the truth further. And when that happens, conversion of heart soon follows. Thank God for Christopher’s ministry. May he continue to break through and disperse the darkness of lies and show people the way towards the light of truth.

  • yblegen

    Thanks StMichael Pray4us for revealing how West’s mission has touched your life. If I had known only an ounce of what West teaches, I could have saved myself a lot of grief and heartache in my own life. I recommend West’s Book “Theology of the Body for Beginners” to anyone I come in contact with.

    I don’t think you can truly take in what he is teaching and not fall down on your knees to thank our Father in heaven for giving us the ability(though imperfect) to know more about the love that exists within the Holy Trinity. You ask, ” what does TOB have to do with the Holy Trinity”? You gotta read the book.

    I feel sorry for the academicians or whoever would criticize West. They obviously can’t get their heads out of the clouds long enough see how the truth of his simple talks have inspired and helped hundreds, if not thousands, who had no where to go for answers about human sexuality.

  • oancia

    I wrote a letter to lifesite news, a phenomenal ministry which typically focuses on real scandals, issues, etc contrary to our faith, to the same effect.

    Let’s not stab our brother in the back. Let’s be generous in focusing on his body of work, perhaps he’d like to rephrase some of his wording – big deal, we are still human, are we not? I totally, totally agree Matt with your article.

    Even Catholic Exchange has a politically correct disclaimer that it’s not taking “sides” in the “debate”. Why not? Is CE afraid to come to West’s defense? If we are stooping to criticism of Christopher West, virtually all of the well meaning Catholics I know personally trying to live a faithful life are in big trouble. I thought the point of our faith was to share it – - – few do this better than West.

    Blessings…..

  • http://www.jficthus.com Fr. James Farfaglia

    Matthew Pinto’s article is excellent and right on the money. It seems to me that much of the criticism against Christopher West is coming from “conservative” and “traditional” circles that may have a rather jansenistic view towards sexuality. It is true that concupiscence will always be a part of our lives because we are fallen human creatures. But is it possible for a man to make love to his wife without being ruled by lust? If we were to answer this question in the negative, then Christianity is a huge lie. The main thread behind John Paul’s TOB is to correct the jansenistic view of human sexuality that prevaded the Church at one time. Jansenism is still around. Sex within the sacrament of matrimony is a beautiful and holy reality, not something disgusting just to have children.
    -Fr. James Farfaglia, Corpus Christi, TX

  • cdyke

    “CE Editor’s note: Although we have accepted two submissions in the past two weeks that are defensive of Christopher West, CE is not taking sides in the ongoing debate.]”

    …It does appear that CE is taking sides. Perhaps this is not the case, but I have yet to see any arguments against C. West’s approach on this site. If CE wants to be “fair & balanced” within the realm of orthodoxy then they should open up the debate on their site a bit more. I enjoy the site, don’t get me wrong, but by appearing to take sides (which CE claims it does not) you are potentiallty alienating readers who differ on the C. West debate than say Janet Smith and Matt Pinto.

    Open dialogue has the potential to unite, while monologues attempt to silence the opposition, which ultimately leads to division. Allow the arguments from both sides to speak for themselves so that your readers have the opportunity to employ their critical thinking skills.

  • Mary Kochan

    Well, cdyke, I think if you spent a bit of time looking at the comments under the Janet Smith article, you would see that no one could accuse us of stifling debate around here.

    http://catholicexchange.com/2009/05/28/118937/

    We can only work with what is submitted to us.

  • mamreilly

    StMichaelPray4Us – As a member of the generation that grew up in the 80′s – Ditto.

    BTW, I’m an orthodox, conservative, Roman Catholic husband to wife of 14 years, five kids (100% succesful with NFP) who adores our Lord in the blessed sacrament during the wee hours of the morning every week.

    I don’t say this to brag. I say this because I had a reawakening of the faith of my youth about six years ago and the two people on earth who brought me back were Jeff Cavins and Christopher West. Up until I “met” them in their work, I was a nominal Catholic who was living very much in the muck of this world.

    I am one of the fruits of their work. I only hope that I at least dimly reflect the light of Jesus Christ that shines through each of them. God bless Christopher West.

  • cdyke

    Mary,
    My comment obviously touched a nerve.

    I apologize for questioning CE’s alliances and apporach to this debate.

    I have and stiil do appreciate what I see in the comments sections from readers as a form of dialogue, but long to see the experts submit an article from the opposing side. I realize, now, that you have no control over this. My assumptions were hastily written.

    In Christ,
    cdyke

  • Mary Kochan

    I apologize also to you for overreacting. I changed my post.

    The disclaimer you referred to was to avoid exactly that accusation. It is what other websites have done that are following this.

    It is very frustrating for me as an editor because it seems that in the public eye — a public made up supposedly of our charitable fellow Catholics — there is just no way to do this right, even if you spend hours and hours trying to make sure you are fair about something.

  • Mary Kochan

    Fr. James, Jansenism might contribute to some of the criticism, but as a blanket statement it is unfair and fails to acknowledge substantive concerns and disagreements.

  • http://catholichawk.com PrairieHawk

    Is there someone who can sum up for us the objections to West’s work in plain language? I would find that very beneficial. I have tried reading Dr. Schindler elsewhere but I don’t have the background for it. Perhaps Dr. Schindler himself could be persuaded to write an accessible article summing up his critique?

  • http://heyitsjustablogman.blogspot.com/ jackster

    Assuming the Christopher West’s Presentation of TOB is “Nihil Obstat”, then appearing on ABC was an advertising and public relations coup.

    In advertising/PR we use “AIDA” as a guide – Attention-Interest-Desire-Action. It works like a funnel where you first get a lot of attention, which spurs some interest and investigation, which draws some to desire your offering, and a few to take action (typically purchase

    The ABC exposure gained Attention and sparked Interest in TOB. That ABC edited the segment and skewed the message to pander to their viewer demographic is immaterial from a promotional perspective. All a PR-pro, or Ad-man would expect from one segment on one show is to gain broad Attention and some Interest.

    At the wide end of the funnel (Attention) the fact that it hardly matters what one actually says is exemplified in the old show-business adage; “Any press is good press”.

    Painting a car flourescent orange and mounting it on the roof will get attention, and cause some interest in your offering even though your not in the business of painting cars flourescent orange.

    Thanks ABC

  • Terri Kimmel

    dierdrew,

    Reading your comments I have to wonder if you’ve read anything by Christopher West. What you’ve said indicates unfamiliarity with his work.

    Mary,

    I thought Fr. James was quite diplomatic in his word choice. He said “much” and “may”, not blanketing anything. I have to agree with him also on the possible jansenism. Particularly from the scathing criticims of some clergy that I have read, I believe jansenism is festering in some circles.

  • oancia

    I appreciate CE responding to the criticism, and it is unfortunate as you say that you end up darned if you do, darned if you don’t. I respect CE’s right to take a point of view, I am not sure where the idea that every website and publication needs to provide equal time to opposite sides of a debate, that’s all.

    We must always maintain our charity and I apologize for my remarks to “CE” (which is really the people behind CE) lacking this. Keep up the great work. Blessings, D.

  • daughterofeve

    I’ve read some of West’s stuff, and I gotta say, I thought it was great. I wish he’d write some stuff for teenagers.

  • GaryT

    Wow! I had no idea this topic had so much controversy.

    I went and read some of the criticisms of West. The criticism of his theology seems to be one of emphasis or nuance, rather than his actual theology. As I read this, I got to thinking that West is not so much out to proclaim Catholic theology as much as to correct the various sexual heresies within our culture today. Because most of his audiences have already bought into these heresies, he must meet them where they are and drag them towards the Truth. Since his job is really to correct heresy, his focus is on teaching the Truth that corrects the heresy, rather than painting a broad theological picture. As a result, his teachings will naturally be theologically incomplete and focused on sex.

    Also, I would like to say that talking to a technical audience (i.e. theologians), talking to the press, and talking to regular people (Joe six-pack) are very different. It is unfair to take what is said to one audience and judge it by another’s standards.

    In my own career, I spend a fair amount of time talking to all three audiences (although my technical audience are engineers, not theologians). When talking to a technical audience, precision in speech is very critical, as each nuance takes on extra importance. The precise meaning of particular words are the jargon only understood by the technical community. Here is an example of technical jargon: this is a specific objection raised with regards to Christopher West’s teachings:

    “The first regards the emphasis placed on the subject’s intention and will, or the “heart,” in matters involving the sexual body and relations between men and women. He often stresses, for example, that the body is good and “the problem with lust is in your heart.” The question is whether, in stressing purity of heart, he gives sufficient weight to the continued objective presence in the body of the fomes peccati (the tendency to sin), however much mitigated by virtue and grace. Even saints do not escape the infralapsarian state of their existence.”

    I thought I understood TOB reasonably well before I read the above. After reading this, I’m not sure I have any idea what he is talking about! His writing may be precise, but it is totally unclear to me what he means.

    Which brings me to the second audience. When talking to regular (non-technical) people, it is critical to lose the jargon and speak as plainly as possible. The goal is to provide clarity for people who are not versed in the minutae. Often times precision is lost at the expense of the audience getting the basic idea that you are trying to convey. It drives the technical people crazy, but everyone else appreciates the clarity in the understanding they receive. Jesus made a special effort to speak to regular people using regular words and analogies; I think this is a good model to follow. Finding words that are both clear to understand and technically precise can be a real challenge at times. The writers of the CCC struggled mightily to accomplish both and often fail miserably. I don’t see how we could expect West to be both precise and clear all of the time either.

    Finally, talking to the press is entirely different. Sometimes the journalist already knows the story they want to tell. But since they are a journalist and not a topical expert, they find a topical expert and try to get them to say what they are looking for so the journalist can then quote the expert. This of course runs the risk of badly distorting the overall context of what the expert was saying. I suspect this happenned with West’s interview on ABC. TOB cannot be fully explained in a 7 minute segment, so ABC picked the statements that were most provocative sounding and used those. After all, that was the story they were wanting to tell, not the actual story of TOB.

    So should West have avoided the ABC interview? I say no. As was previously pointed out, it probably got the attention of a lot of people that otherwise may have never heard of TOB before. The segment was distorted, provocative, and incomplete. But it wasn’t inaccurate, which is a whole lot better than the things we normally hear from TV about sex. It certainly wasn’t a “debacle” as I have read some call it. A debacle would be a Catholic theologian grossly mis-stating clear Catholic teaching (which I recently watched elsewhere).

  • yinekka

    With respect, have any of Christopoher West’s learned critics ever spoken to an audience of 18-30 year olds about sex? These under/not catechised products of our sex saturated culture have to be spoken to in language that will reach them while not watering down the teaching of the Church; not an easy task. The high theology of an orthodox Catholic mileau simply will not reach these people to whom the baton of Catholicism must be passed on.

  • HomeschoolNfpDad

    Let’s go back to randyengel’s comment at http://catholicexchange.com/2009/05/28/118937/ .

    He quotes Chapter Five of Good News About Sex & Marriage – Answers to Your Honest Questions About Catholic Teachings:

    “Perhaps in some abstract, objective sense, there is nothing to condemn mere penetration of the anus as absolutely and in every case immoral. But subjectively speaking… it is very difficult to justify anal penetration as a loving act of foreplay to the marital embrace. It is an act that seems to stem much more from the disorder of lust than from a genuine desire to symbolize and renew the marriage commitment.”

    Now, here in order to understand this quote, it is necessary to have at least some passing familiarity with the philosophy underlying the Theology of the Body. John Paul doesn’t stick with strict, subjective phenomenology in TOB. Instead, he uses phenomenology as a tool – perhaps even a framework – for discussion of Catholic theology. What does this mean? Well, if you read Love and Responsibility, you can discover that John Paul’s philosophy of the person is such that every person must be understood both objectively and subjectively at the same time. Each is simultaneously a philosophical object and a philosophical subject. In simpler language, this means that every person must be understood as both an actor – i.e. a subject who does things – and a recipient of action – i.e. an object, with respect to other persons – and both of these are true at the same time. If you don’t get this simple concept, then you don’t have a whit of understanding of what John Paul teaches in TOB because this fundamental understanding forms the basis of his philosophical thought which leads to TOB. Now, you don’t have to understand this on an academic level; you can use alternate language to get to this understanding, even colloquial language. But if you don’t get the idea of the human person as subject-object, then you’ve completely missed the basis for constructing the TOB.

    Christopher West, of course, gets this, and he can talk about it using technical jargon and more common language (as GaryT mentions). So let’s revisit that quote from his book in light of a question likely to be posed in these dark times:

    Student: What about anal sex? In school, they always said anything goes, as long as it’s consensual.

    Teacher: Do you remember what we discussed about the human person? That each person is a subject who does things and an object to whom others do things? And that both of these are simultaneously true all the time?

    Student: Yes. And that if either of these aspects is ever dismissed, then something is evil because it does not respect our dignity.

    Teacher: That’s right. Now, let’s get to Mr. West’s quote on the matter. “Perhaps in some abstract, objective sense, there is nothing to condemn mere penetration of the anus as absolutely and in every case immoral. But subjectively speaking… it is very difficult to justify anal penetration as a loving act of foreplay to the marital embrace. It is an act that seems to stem much more from the disorder of lust than from a genuine desire to symbolize and renew the marriage commitment.”

    Student: Oh yes, then there are always two senses in play! The act must be objectively good and subjectively good at the same time when dealing with persons, or else it is not good.

    Teacher: Now what do think Mr. West is really saying here when he says that anal penetration might be objectively acceptable but is difficult to see as subjectively acceptable?

    —–

    If you cannot answer that question in its proper context, then you do not understand Mr. West, TOB, or the teachings of John Paul. How can anyone criticize Mr. West for this comment when the very context of his teaching necessitates that goods always be understood from both the objective and subjective sense when they pertain to the human person? For West to say something is objectively acceptable but subjectively wrong is the same thing as saying it is wrong, period. It’s an all or nothing proposition for the human person, whose dignity is at stake.

    If we must criticize Mr. West – and especially if we must do so using technical language – let’s at least demonstrate sufficient charity to refrain from ripping his statements out of their philosophical context.