<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Act Now! Stop Obama&#8217;s Contentious Conscience Charade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/</link>
	<description>Catholic News, Catholic Articles, Catholic Apologetics, Catholic Content, Catholic Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: plowshare</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/comment-page-1/#comment-38837</link>
		<dc:creator>plowshare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/#comment-38837</guid>
		<description>Bambushka, there is no law or bill that requires pregnant women to view sonograms.  This is just abortion-promoting propaganda. The laws only require that women be given the option of viewing a sonogram when going for an abortion, and the one with which I am most acquainted requires this only if indeed a sonogram was taken. (They are routinely taken to confirm that the woman is indeed pregnant: doing an abortion on a non-pregnant woman is considered to be malpractice.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bambushka, there is no law or bill that requires pregnant women to view sonograms.  This is just abortion-promoting propaganda. The laws only require that women be given the option of viewing a sonogram when going for an abortion, and the one with which I am most acquainted requires this only if indeed a sonogram was taken. (They are routinely taken to confirm that the woman is indeed pregnant: doing an abortion on a non-pregnant woman is considered to be malpractice.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Kochan</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/comment-page-1/#comment-38834</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Kochan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/#comment-38834</guid>
		<description>The links are all working for me, Bambushka.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The links are all working for me, Bambushka.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bambushka</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/comment-page-1/#comment-38831</link>
		<dc:creator>bambushka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/#comment-38831</guid>
		<description>These links: http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/&#039;+String.fromCharCode(99,111,110,115,99,105,101,110,99,101,99,111,109,109,101,110,116,64,104,104,115,46,103,111,118)+&#039;?&#039; consciencecomment@hhs.gov is not working and the comment  link to the pdf of the regulation is also not present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These links: <a href="http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/" rel="nofollow">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/</a>&#8216;+String.fromCharCode(99,111,110,115,99,105,101,110,99,101,99,111,109,109,101,110,116,64,104,104,115,46,103,111,118)+&#8217;?&#8217; <a href="mailto:consciencecomment@hhs.gov">consciencecomment@hhs.gov</a> is not working and the comment  link to the pdf of the regulation is also not present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bambushka</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/comment-page-1/#comment-38830</link>
		<dc:creator>bambushka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/03/16/116705/#comment-38830</guid>
		<description>This is ludicrous. Just a few months ago, there were those who stated that it was unethical and unjust that a doctor by law would be required to tell a pregnant woman that she must view a sonogram of her baby before considering abortion. It was against the physician’s rights to require what he/she must tell the patient. This is the mirror image of that law; health professionals must now give all the options pertaining to the death culture, but none of the options which everyone can live with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ludicrous. Just a few months ago, there were those who stated that it was unethical and unjust that a doctor by law would be required to tell a pregnant woman that she must view a sonogram of her baby before considering abortion. It was against the physician’s rights to require what he/she must tell the patient. This is the mirror image of that law; health professionals must now give all the options pertaining to the death culture, but none of the options which everyone can live with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

