<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Be a Professional Catholic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catholicexchange.com/2009/01/17/115151/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/01/17/115151/</link>
	<description>Catholic News, Catholic Articles, Catholic Apologetics, Catholic Content, Catholic Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HomeschoolNfpDad</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/01/17/115151/comment-page-1/#comment-37503</link>
		<dc:creator>HomeschoolNfpDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/01/17/115151/#comment-37503</guid>
		<description>Noel, recall Father&#039;s proffered definition of sloth: &quot;Sloth is a disease of the will.&quot; Under this definition, I believe that someone who is &quot;very active and devote[s] all one’s efforts to one’s professional career&quot; is slothful. Such a person has a defect of the will. Clearly it is not due to laziness but rather to a disordered application of the will, in which the person demonstrates that his career is important but his faith is not. Any person capable of working hard at his career is also capable of working hard at his faith. The disorder of the will is to refrain from applying one&#039;s energy (so clearly demonstrated while at work) to the problem of growing in holiness.

That is sloth, even if it is not generalized laziness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel, recall Father&#8217;s proffered definition of sloth: &#8220;Sloth is a disease of the will.&#8221; Under this definition, I believe that someone who is &#8220;very active and devote[s] all one’s efforts to one’s professional career&#8221; is slothful. Such a person has a defect of the will. Clearly it is not due to laziness but rather to a disordered application of the will, in which the person demonstrates that his career is important but his faith is not. Any person capable of working hard at his career is also capable of working hard at his faith. The disorder of the will is to refrain from applying one&#8217;s energy (so clearly demonstrated while at work) to the problem of growing in holiness.</p>
<p>That is sloth, even if it is not generalized laziness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noelfitz</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/01/17/115151/comment-page-1/#comment-37493</link>
		<dc:creator>noelfitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catholicexchange.com/2009/01/17/115151/#comment-37493</guid>
		<description>A brilliant article.  It provides food for thought and action.  Thank you so much,  Fr Farfaglia.

However one could be very active and devote all one&#039;s efforts to one&#039;s professional career and not be slothful, yet neglect the development of one&#039;s Faith.

The ideas in this article correspond to those of St Josemaria Escriva.

God bless, 

NoelFitz.
_________________________________________________

In necessariis, unitas; in dubiis, libertas; in omnibus, caritas.
_________________________________________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A brilliant article.  It provides food for thought and action.  Thank you so much,  Fr Farfaglia.</p>
<p>However one could be very active and devote all one&#8217;s efforts to one&#8217;s professional career and not be slothful, yet neglect the development of one&#8217;s Faith.</p>
<p>The ideas in this article correspond to those of St Josemaria Escriva.</p>
<p>God bless, </p>
<p>NoelFitz.<br />
_________________________________________________</p>
<p>In necessariis, unitas; in dubiis, libertas; in omnibus, caritas.<br />
_________________________________________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

