Comments on: Does the Stupid Party Have to be This Stupid

By: patti

patti — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:27:05 +0000

Great article, Mary. I REALLY wish you or someone would get this to the Republican party heads. I agree with the person who suggested you become their speech writer.

By: CherylDickow

CherylDickow — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:59:20 +0000

I may have missed it being mentioned but you’ve got to admit that Biden’s stupidity at a fund raiser this weekend was remarkable. Telling everyone that the election of Obama as president will put him (Obama) smack in the middle of an international crisis because of the many people who will want to test him. Stupid and scary.

By: Loretta

Loretta — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:11:50 +0000

You know, Mary,
After B.O. made the point about abortion being an issue of “privacy,” I turned to my husband and said,
“Some day my husband will irritate me. Maybe what he’s saying is that – in the PRIVACY of my own home, between me and my ‘spiritual leader’ – I have the right to do away with the irritant because it affects my health.”

My husband answered back, “OK…now you’re scaring me.”

Two can play this game, right?

Oh…there’s a difference?
I’m not really seeing it.

By: Grace Harman

Grace Harman — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:12:16 +0000

This is like Germany before Hitler was elected. He inspired the people with the promise of a “Super Race” (based on the killing of those who were “screened out” as unwanted or defective. Obama promises socialized “Health Care” including the government funding of millions of abortions. This “free” healthcare will cause rationing, caps, and finally euthanasia, and massive tax increases besides. This support of killing of the innocent is shameful and stupid. God will not help us if we elect this vile “choice”.

By: Mary Kochan

Mary Kochan — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:08:34 +0000

Well, that would kill our tax exempt status.

By: heinz

heinz — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:06:27 +0000

Maybe we should form a Catholic Exchange Party, nominate a presidential candidate for 2012, and start campaigning next year. Perhaps we can finally have a solid candidate who is willing to stand up for all the Church teaches.

By: Peter M. Calabrese

Peter M. Calabrese — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:12:53 +0000

It would be surrendering to vote for the third party candidates. It is nbot over yet. We can still pull this out. How about voting for third party candidates in local and state elections in stead. OR at least let’s wait until the mid-terms – if we lose – to punish the party elite. Too many babies should not be punished in order to punish a political party.

Get out the vote!

By: MICHAEL

MICHAEL — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:11:52 +0000

I agree with you San Gabriel 100% that even a outstanding performance by MCcain in the deabtes would not make a big difference because the MSM has already annointed BHO. For Pete’s sake all you have to do is look at the Dem Primnary. HRC beat BHO in many of the debates, but MSM was against her. Whether people want to admit it or not the MSM is the CAUSE of this election. mcCain has not helped himself, but the outcome would still be the same. the system is corrupt and a huge change is needed.

By: noelfitz

noelfitz — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:46:03 +0000

Mary

You wrote:
“Since I am about to run into trouble here”.

I know the feeling and I sympathize.

When I was in the States years ago I used to watch on TV William Buckley, who recently died.

He was a conservative and loyal Catholic who could argue cogently, entertainingly and convincingly.

May the Lord have mercy on him.

Regards to all.

Noelfitz.

By: Mary Kochan

Mary Kochan — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:43:21 +0000

Ok and it is Mill, not Mills. The freepers caught it. Now it is fixed.