<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gainesville Voters Set to Reverse Radical Homosexual Ordinance Enacted by their City Council</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catholicexchange.com/2008/08/11/113439/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2008/08/11/113439/</link>
	<description>Catholic News, Catholic Articles, Catholic Apologetics, Catholic Content, Catholic Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Jewell</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2008/08/11/113439/comment-page-1/#comment-33097</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Jewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcesite.com/2008/08/11/113439/#comment-33097</guid>
		<description>Hmmm - how is it that we so often read about political leaders, especially local politicians - ELECTED leaders - who have little or no common moral and/or ethical ground with the constituents who have ELECTED them? Has this been a problem with our democratic republic all along? 

I think we have come close to this issue in politics forum questions, but we seem to have no answer. After all, for one prominent example, the likes of Barack Obama has come out of his being elected here in Illinois, when I see (have seen since his first ballot appearance) that he likely should never have been. And, &#039;race&#039; has been a mainstay (&#039;mania&#039;-stay?) of his campaigns all along - when he ran for federal Senator, one Chicago columnist &#039;of color&#039; called on people &#039;of color&#039; to vote for him quite precisely just because of his race he shared with them. Of course, the columnist also shared his socialistic so-called &#039;liberal&#039; so-called &#039;progressive&#039; views - from right out of the 1920s, 30s and 40s. So when Alan Keyes, a conservative just as &#039;of color&#039;, became his opponent, Mr. Keyes got no such racialist &#039;recommendation&#039;.   

And, now, widespread national groups are as enamored of him as Illinois folks have been - for no apparent &#039;good&#039; reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8211; how is it that we so often read about political leaders, especially local politicians &#8211; ELECTED leaders &#8211; who have little or no common moral and/or ethical ground with the constituents who have ELECTED them? Has this been a problem with our democratic republic all along? </p>
<p>I think we have come close to this issue in politics forum questions, but we seem to have no answer. After all, for one prominent example, the likes of Barack Obama has come out of his being elected here in Illinois, when I see (have seen since his first ballot appearance) that he likely should never have been. And, &#8216;race&#8217; has been a mainstay (&#8216;mania&#8217;-stay?) of his campaigns all along &#8211; when he ran for federal Senator, one Chicago columnist &#8216;of color&#8217; called on people &#8216;of color&#8217; to vote for him quite precisely just because of his race he shared with them. Of course, the columnist also shared his socialistic so-called &#8216;liberal&#8217; so-called &#8216;progressive&#8217; views &#8211; from right out of the 1920s, 30s and 40s. So when Alan Keyes, a conservative just as &#8216;of color&#8217;, became his opponent, Mr. Keyes got no such racialist &#8216;recommendation&#8217;.   </p>
<p>And, now, widespread national groups are as enamored of him as Illinois folks have been &#8211; for no apparent &#8216;good&#8217; reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arkanabar Ilarsadin</title>
		<link>http://catholicexchange.com/2008/08/11/113439/comment-page-1/#comment-33094</link>
		<dc:creator>Arkanabar Ilarsadin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newcesite.com/2008/08/11/113439/#comment-33094</guid>
		<description>Deo gratia, democracy can&#039;t &lt;i&gt;always&lt;/i&gt; be used to subvert the will of the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deo gratia, democracy can&#8217;t <i>always</i> be used to subvert the will of the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

