What I wanted to know was if anyone else had heard of that distinction?

The reason I asked is because the article doesn't seem to make that distinction all.sorry if i didn't make my question clear. 

And since you bring it up, it's pretty easy to dissolve a sacramental marriage, if it hasn't been consummated.  Happens frequently, in fact.  That's not what this article is about, though.

Since you acknowledge that you don't understand "cannon" law, perhaps it would be best to defer to the experts. 

Clare with no i

 Traditionally the indissolubility of marriage as indicated by Jesus is a attribute of a sacramental marriage.

In the writing of Paul for instance he makes reference to those who are married to unbelievers (non-Christians).  It is better they stay married, in hope of converting their spouse, but if the unbeliever dismisses them they are free to marry.

  Believers are not permitted however to dismiss or be dismissed.  There is not possible to dissolve a sacramental marriage.  

Someone who is not validly baptized does not have a sacramental marriage regardless of weather or not they have a licit ( legal ) marriage within cannon law.

The original question was: “What ramifications does this have on my marriage?”

From the practical standpoint I’d say not much, but from a theological standpoint if there is every a reason to apply for annulment, marriage to someone who is not baptized is nearly sufficient grounds in and of itself for the declaration to be granted, because although the marriage was legally permitted it is not a sacred and indissoluble sign.

That is my understanding of how things work in any case.  I’m by no means an expert.

I do not quite follow your point.

Additionally, please spell check your writing because your readers will miss your point if they can't understand what you are saying.

There are two terms of importance, one that is not used in the article at all. 

licit (legal)  

valid (sacramental).

Someone who does cannot partake in a sacrament cannot have a valid (sacramental) marriage. That does not preclude them from being lagitimately married withing church cannon law (licit).

So assuming cannon law is followed a non-baptized person may be licitly married in the church, but an annulment usually addresses two things.

My understanding of the importance of the differences is that the indisoluability of sacramental marriage as Jesus directs it is meant for those who are believes and cannot be expected to be binding on those who are not, as recorded in Paul letters. So in the case of a civil devorce a declaration of nullity is much more easily granted because there was never a sacramental bond and the declartion is more of a legal formality rather then an ivestigation as to weather or not the sacrament existed in the first place.